Optical Licensing, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 12 cases

12 cases on record naming Optical Licensing, LLC: 12 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

12 cases on record

Cases on record
12
As claimant
12
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G11C7/00 · G11C7/22 · G11C7/10
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
4:21-cv-01858 Optical Licensing, LLC v. TTM Technologies North America, LLC Plaintiff N.D. Ohio 29 Sep 2021 76 d Voluntary dismissal
8:21-cv-02308 Optical Licensing, LLC v. Analog Devices, Inc. Plaintiff M.D. Fla. 29 Sep 2021 117 d Voluntary dismissal
0:21-cv-61832 Optical Licensing, LLC v. Heico Corporation Plaintiff S.D. Fla. 31 Aug 2021 111 d Voluntary dismissal
6:21-cv-00904 Optical Licensing, LLC v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 31 Aug 2021 90 d Voluntary dismissal
6:21-cv-00905 Optical Licensing, LLC v. Lowe's Companies, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 31 Aug 2021 90 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-00880 Optical Licensing, LLC v. Rutronik, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Ohio 28 Apr 2021 61 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-21627 Optical Licensing, LLC v. Sourceability North America, LLC Plaintiff S.D. Fla. 28 Apr 2021 35 d Voluntary dismissal
2:21-cv-00347 Optical Licensing, LLC v. Abacus Industries, Inc. Plaintiff M.D. Fla. 28 Apr 2021 167 d Voluntary dismissal
8:21-cv-01004 Optical Licensing, LLC v. NAC Group, Inc. Plaintiff M.D. Fla. 28 Apr 2021 47 d Voluntary dismissal
6:21-cv-00186 Optical Licensing, LLC v. Arrow Electronics, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 28 Feb 2021 499 d Case Dismissed
6:21-cv-00187 Optical Licensing, LLC v. Avnet, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 28 Feb 2021 17 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-00306 Optical Licensing, LLC v. Mouser Electronics, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 26 Feb 2021 18 d Voluntary dismissal
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Optical Licensing, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Optical Licensing is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.