Opticurrent, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 9 cases

9 cases on record naming Opticurrent, LLC: 9 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

9 cases on record

Cases on record
9
As claimant
9
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H03K17/687 · H03K17/0412 · H03K17/04 · H01L21/822
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:21-cv-00159 Opticurrent, LLC v. Bitfenix Co. Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 10 May 2021 392 d Likely Settlement
2021-1712 Opticurrent, LLC v. Power Integrations, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 5 Mar 2021 355 d Closed
3:21-cv-01425 Opticurrent, LLC v. ON Semiconductor Corporation Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 26 Feb 2021 70 d Voluntary dismissal
2019-2172 Opticurrent, LLC v. Power Integrations, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 24 Jul 2019 379 d Closed
2019-2141 Opticurrent, LLC v. Power Integrations, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 15 Jul 2019 388 d Closed
3:19-cv-03563 Opticurrent, LLC v. Power Integrations, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 19 Jun 2019 1079 d Voluntary dismissal
3:17-cv-03597 Opticurrent, LLC v. Power Integrations, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 22 Jun 2017 620 d Judgment on the Merits
2:16-cv-01180 Opticurrent, LLC v. Mouser Electronics, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 19 Oct 2016 2057 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00325 Opticurrent, LLC v. Power Integrations, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 1 Apr 2016 452 d Case Transferred
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Opticurrent, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Opticurrent is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.