Packet Intelligence, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 16 cases

16 cases on record naming Packet Intelligence, LLC: 11 as claimant, 5 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

16 cases on record

Cases on record
16
As claimant
11
As respondent
5
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H04L29/06 · H04L12/56 · H04L12/24 · H04L12/26 · G06F12/08 · G06F12/12
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
22-2064 NetScout Systems v. Packet Intelligence, LLC Defendant Fed. Cir. 27 Jul 2022 645 d Case Remanded
22-1401 Packet Intelligence, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 25 Jan 2022 828 d Unpatentable
22-1403 Packet Intelligence, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 25 Jan 2022 828 d Unpatentable
22-1405 Juniper Networks, Inc. v. Packet Intelligence, LLC Defendant Fed. Cir. 25 Jan 2022 828 d Unpatentable
22-1406 Juniper Networks, Inc. v. Packet Intelligence, LLC Defendant Fed. Cir. 25 Jan 2022 828 d Unpatentable
20-1289 NetScout Systems, Inc. v. Packet Intelligence, LLC Defendant U.S. Supreme Court 17 Mar 2021 33 d Appeal Denied
3:19-cv-04741 Packet Intelligence, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 13 Aug 2019 1928 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2019-2041 Packet Intelligence, LLC v. NetScout Systems, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 18 Jun 2019 392 d Closed
2019-1069 Packet Intelligence, LLC v. Sandvine Corporation Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 11 Oct 2018 25 d Closed
2:18-cv-00381 Packet Intelligence, LLC v. Ericsson, Inc Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Aug 2018 383 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-00382 Packet Intelligence, LLC v. Nokia Solutions and Networks US, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Aug 2018 392 d Likely Settlement
1:17-cv-01633 NetScout Systems, Inc. v. Packet Intelligence, LLC Defendant D. Del. 10 Nov 2017 76 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00230 Packet Intelligence, LLC v. NetScout Systems, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Mar 2016 906 d Judgment on the Merits
2:16-cv-00147 Packet Intelligence, LLC v. Sandvine Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 17 Feb 2016 723 d Judgment on the Merits
2:14-cv-01122 Packet Intelligence, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 16 Dec 2014 76 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:14-cv-00252 Packet Intelligence, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 24 Mar 2014 359 d Out-of-court Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Packet Intelligence, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Packet Intelligence is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.