Pantech Wireless, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 11 cases

11 cases on record naming Pantech Wireless, Inc.: 0 as claimant, 11 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

11 cases on record

Cases on record
11
As claimant
0
As respondent
11
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
3:17-cv-00430 Iron Oak Technologies, LLC v. Pantech Wireless, Inc. Defendant N.D. Tex. 14 Feb 2017 35 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00306 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Pantech Wireless, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 30 Mar 2016 225 d Voluntary dismissal
2016-1140 Adaptix, Inc. v. Pantech Wireless, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 28 Oct 2015 288 d Closed
2:14-cv-01152 Dynamic Hosting Company, LLC v. Pantech Wireless, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 253 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-01058 REC Software USA, Inc. v. Pantech Wireless, Inc. Defendant W.D. Wash. 11 Jul 2014 553 d Out-of-court Settlement
6:14-cv-01021 Orlando Communications, LLC v. Pantech Wireless, Inc. Defendant M.D. Fla. 26 Jun 2014 419 d Voluntary dismissal
6:14-cv-01029 Orlando Communications, LLC v. Pantech Wireless, Inc. Defendant M.D. Fla. 26 Jun 2014 419 d Voluntary dismissal
1:14-cv-02211 Advanced Audio Devices, LLC v. Pantech Wireless, Inc. Defendant N.D. Ill. 28 Mar 2014 1865 d Case Dismissed
6:13-cv-00778 Adaptix, Inc. v. Pantech Wireless, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 15 Oct 2013 1021 d Likely Settlement
6:12-cv-00942 Eon Corp IP Holdings, LLC v. Pantech Wireless, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 19 Dec 2012 891 d Procedural Outcome
6:12-cv-00020 Adaptix, Inc. v. Pantech Wireless, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 13 Jan 2012 1355 d Judgment on the Merits
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Pantech Wireless, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Pantech Wireless is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.