Peloton Interactive, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 22 cases

22 cases on record naming Peloton Interactive, Inc.: 7 as claimant, 15 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

22 cases on record

Cases on record
22
As claimant
7
As respondent
15
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
A63B22/00 · A63B22/02 · A63B24/00 · A63B71/06 · A63B23/12 · A63B21/22 · A63B21/005 · G16H20/30 · A63B21/015 · A63B22/06 · G16H15/00 · A63B71/00
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:26-cv-00424 Portus Singapore PTE Ltd. & Portus PTY Ltd. v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 22 May 2026 77 d Voluntary dismissal
25-1636 In re: NEC CORPORATION v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 10 Apr 2025 91 d Voluntary dismissal
25-1637 Nec v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 10 Apr 2025 91 d Appeal Dismissed
1:24-cv-08486 Fleet Connect Solutions, LLC v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. Defendant S.D.N.Y. 7 Nov 2024 90 d Voluntary dismissal
6:23-cv-00682 Fleet Connect Solutions, LLC v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 21 Sep 2023 412 d Case Transferred
337-TA-1265 DISH Network Corporation v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. Defendant United States International Trade Commission 3 May 2023 29 d Case Accepted
3:22-cv-00606 Johnson Health Tech Co., Ltd. v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. Defendant W.D. Wis. 20 Oct 2022 826 d Dismissed with Prejudice
337-TA-1310 Peloton Interactive, Inc. v. iFIT, Inc. Plaintiff United States International Trade Commission 7 Apr 2022 109 d Closed
2:21-cv-09252 Lululemon Athletica Canada, Inc. v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. Defendant C.D. Cal. 29 Nov 2021 114 d Closed
1:21-cv-01605 Peloton Interactive, Inc. v. iFIT, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 12 Nov 2021 186 d Likely Settlement
2:21-cv-00132 DISH Technologies, LLC v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 13 Apr 2021 751 d Case Dismissed
1:21-cv-00507 iFIT, Inc. v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 7 Apr 2021 405 d Likely Settlement
1:21-cv-00160 Peloton Interactive, Inc. v. Echelon Fitness Multimedia, LLC Plaintiff D. Del. 5 Feb 2021 371 d Case Stayed
2:20-cv-00382 Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc. v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 14 Dec 2020 275 d Procedural Outcome
1:20-cv-01386 iFIT, Inc. v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 15 Oct 2020 564 d Case Stayed
1:20-cv-00662 Peloton Interactive, Inc. v. iFIT, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 15 May 2020 732 d Likely Settlement
1:19-cv-01903 Peloton Interactive, Inc. v. Echelon Fitness Multimedia, LLC Plaintiff D. Del. 8 Oct 2019 1129 d Consent Judgment
2:19-cv-00317 Peloton Interactive, Inc. v. Flywheel Sports, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 20 Sep 2019 139 d Likely Settlement
2:18-cv-00390 Peloton Interactive, Inc. v. Flywheel Sports, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 12 Sep 2018 512 d Likely Settlement
1:16-cv-08303 Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. Defendant S.D.N.Y. 25 Oct 2016 491 d Likely Settlement
1:16-cv-06392 VR Optics, LLC v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. Defendant S.D.N.Y. 11 Aug 2016 1692 d Procedural Outcome
2:16-cv-02407 Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. Defendant C.D. Cal. 8 Apr 2016 199 d Case Transferred
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Peloton Interactive, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Peloton Interactive is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.