Polycom, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 25 cases

25 cases on record naming Polycom, Inc.: 2 as claimant, 23 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

25 cases on record

Cases on record
25
As claimant
2
As respondent
23
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
7:24-cv-00289 Webcon Vectors, LLC v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 16 Nov 2024 3 d Voluntary dismissal
6:23-cv-00876 Estech Systems IP, LLC v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 21 Dec 2023 259 d Dismissed with Prejudice
24-1147 directPacket Research, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 14 Nov 2023 589 d Appeal Dismissed
23-1201 Polycom, Inc. v. Fullview, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 30 Nov 2022 516 d Appeal Dismissed in Part
6:21-cv-00742 American Patents, LLC v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 20 Jul 2021 233 d Likely Settlement
2021-1744 Polycom, Inc. v. directPacket Research, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 17 Mar 2021 271 d Closed
2021-1661 directPacket Research, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 17 Feb 2021 343 d Closed
6:20-cv-00847 Protocol Conversion Solutions, LLC v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 16 Sep 2020 23 d Voluntary dismissal
6:20-cv-00743 Onstream Media Corporation v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 14 Aug 2020 249 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-01438 Valyrian IP, LLC v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 31 Jul 2019 43 d Voluntary dismissal
3:19-cv-03918 directPacket Research, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 8 Jul 2019 1555 d Case Dismissed
5:19-cv-03918 directPacket Research, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 8 Jul 2019 192 d Stayed
1:19-cv-00609 Wave Linx, LLC v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 29 Mar 2019 28 d Voluntary dismissal
6:19-cv-00015 Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 15 Jan 2019 139 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-00980 Beck Branch, LLC v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 1 Jul 2018 66 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-00331 directPacket Research, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant E.D. Va. 21 Jun 2018 377 d Case Transferred
1:17-cv-02692 Realtime Adaptive Streaming, LLC v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant D. Colo. 10 Nov 2017 339 d Out-of-court Settlement
1:16-cv-01035 Meetrix IP, LLC v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 2 Sep 2016 326 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00948 Cypaleo, LLC v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 26 Aug 2016 80 d Likely Settlement
5:16-cv-00093 Packet Tread, LLC v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 9 Jul 2016 11 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00419 2-Way Computing, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant D. Nev. 29 Feb 2016 80 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-01106 North Star Innovations, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 30 Nov 2015 168 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-02297 Positron Intellectual Property, LLC. v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant M.D. Pa. 28 Nov 2015 156 d Likely Settlement
1:15-cv-00005 Adaptive Data, LLC v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 5 Jan 2015 18 d Voluntary dismissal
6:13-cv-00076 Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 17 Jan 2013 1387 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Polycom, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Polycom is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.