Protegrity, Corp. Patent litigation record

Company 37 cases

37 cases on record naming Protegrity, Corp.: 24 as claimant, 13 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

37 cases on record

Cases on record
37
As claimant
24
As respondent
13
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G06F11/00 · G06F11/30 · G06F1/00 · G06F13/00 · G06F12/14 · H04K1/00 · G06F17/30 · G06F21/62 · H04L9/00 · H04L9/32 · G06F21/00
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2016-1268 Protegrity Corporation v. Netskope, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 30 Nov 2015 241 d Closed
6:15-cv-01122 Protegrity Corporation v. Gazzang, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2015 57 d Likely Settlement
3:15-cv-01160 Protegrity Corporation v. Adallom, Inc. Plaintiff D. Conn. 30 Jul 2015 342 d Likely Settlement
3:15-cv-01320 Vormetric, Inc. v. Protegrity Corporation Defendant N.D. Cal. 20 Mar 2015 69 d Procedural Outcome
3:15-cv-00967 Protegrity, Corp. v. PerspecSys USA, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 2 Mar 2015 72 d Closed
3:15-cv-00968 Protegrity, Corp. v. Prime Factors, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 2 Mar 2015 38 d Likely Settlement
3:15-cv-00969 Protegrity, Corp. v. Trustwave Holdings, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 2 Mar 2015 72 d Procedural Outcome
3:15-cv-00857 Protegrity, Corp. v. AJB Software Design, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 25 Feb 2015 77 d Closed
3:15-cv-00858 Protegrity, Corp. v. Aptos, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 25 Feb 2015 77 d Procedural Outcome
3:15-cv-00859 Protegrity, Corp. v. Shift4 Corporation Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 25 Feb 2015 77 d Procedural Outcome
3:15-cv-00860 Shift4 Corporation v. Protegrity, Corp. Defendant N.D. Cal. 25 Feb 2015 77 d Procedural Outcome
3:15-cv-00861 Protegrity, Corp. v. Skyhigh Networks, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 25 Feb 2015 77 d Procedural Outcome
3:15-cv-00825 Protegrity, Corp. v. Corduro, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 24 Feb 2015 44 d Likely Settlement
3:15-cv-00826 TokenEx, LLC v. Protegrity, Corp. Defendant N.D. Cal. 24 Feb 2015 78 d Procedural Outcome
3:15-cv-00801 Corduro, Inc. v. Protegrity Corporation Defendant N.D. Cal. 23 Feb 2015 79 d Procedural Outcome
3:15-cv-00802 IPS Group, Inc. v. Protegrity Corporation Defendant N.D. Cal. 23 Feb 2015 79 d Procedural Outcome
3:15-cv-00803 TransFirst, LLC v. Protegrity Corporation Defendant N.D. Cal. 23 Feb 2015 79 d Procedural Outcome
3:15-md-02600 Protegrity Corporation v. Informatica Corporation Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 20 Feb 2015 990 d Stayed
3:14-cv-01814 Protegrity, Corp. v. Skyhigh Networks, Inc. Plaintiff D. Conn. 3 Dec 2014 79 d MDL Transfer
3:14-cv-01427 Shift4 Corporation v. Protegrity, Corp. Defendant D. Conn. 26 Sep 2014 130 d Other
3:14-cv-04283 Protegrity, Corp. v. Dataguise, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 25 Sep 2014 230 d Procedural Outcome
3:14-cv-02990 Corduro, Inc. v. Protegrity Corporation Defendant N.D. Tex. 20 Aug 2014 184 d Case Transferred
4:14-cv-00445 TokenEx, LLC v. Protegrity, Corp. Defendant N.D. Okla. 31 Jul 2014 204 d Case Transferred
3:14-cv-02727 TransFirst, LLC v. Protegrity Corporation Defendant N.D. Tex. 30 Jul 2014 205 d Case Transferred
3:14-cv-01076 Protegrity, Corp. v. Corduro, Inc. Plaintiff D. Conn. 28 Jul 2014 210 d Case Transferred
3:14-cv-03423 Square, Inc. v. Protegrity Corporation Defendant N.D. Cal. 28 Jul 2014 289 d Procedural Outcome
3:14-cv-03151 Skyhigh Networks, Inc. v. Protegrity Corporation Defendant N.D. Cal. 11 Jul 2014 306 d Procedural Outcome
3:14-cv-00825 Protegrity, Corp. v. Gazzang, Inc. Plaintiff D. Conn. 6 Jun 2014 760 d Likely Settlement
3:14-cv-02588 Protegrity, Corp. v. Informatica Corporation Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 6 Jun 2014 341 d Other
3:14-cv-00075 IPS Group, Inc. v. Protegrity Corporation Defendant S.D. Cal. 10 Jan 2014 406 d Case Transferred
3:13-cv-01802 Protegrity, Corp. v. Shift4 Corporation Plaintiff D. Conn. 4 Dec 2013 443 d MDL Transfer
3:13-cv-01781 Protegrity, Corp. v. Epicor Software, Corp. Plaintiff D. Conn. 2 Dec 2013 445 d MDL Transfer
3:13-cv-01719 Protegrity, Corp. v. TokenEx, LLC Plaintiff D. Conn. 18 Nov 2013 424 d Judgment on the Merits
3:13-cv-01484 Protegrity, Corp. v. AJB Software Design, Inc. Plaintiff D. Conn. 9 Oct 2013 499 d MDL Transfer
3:13-cv-01409 Protegrity, Corp. v. Trustwave Holdings, Inc. Plaintiff D. Conn. 25 Sep 2013 516 d MDL Transfer
3:13-cv-01383 Protegrity Corporation v. PerspecSys USA, Inc. Plaintiff D. Conn. 23 Sep 2013 521 d Case Transferred
3:13-cv-01384 Protegrity Corporation v. Prime Factors, Inc. Plaintiff D. Conn. 23 Sep 2013 518 d MDL Transfer
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Protegrity, Corp. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Protegrity is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.