Pulse Electronics, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 12 cases

12 cases on record naming Pulse Electronics, Inc.: 6 as claimant, 6 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

12 cases on record

Cases on record
12
As claimant
6
As respondent
6
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H01F27/29 · H01L23/32 · H05K3/34 · H05K3/30 · H01R13/66 · H01R13/717 · H01R13/719 · H01R13/33
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
23-1966 Pulse Electronics, Corp. v. Halo Electronics, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 31 May 2023 639 d Appeal Dismissed in Part
23-1772 Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Corp. Defendant Fed. Cir. 20 Apr 2023 680 d Appeal Dismissed in Part
3:21-cv-00768 Optima Direct, LLC v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. Defendant S.D. Cal. 19 Apr 2021 266 d Voluntary dismissal
2021-1856 Pulse Electronics, Inc. v. U.D. Electronic Corp. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 15 Apr 2021 386 d Closed
3:20-cv-01676 Pulse Electronics, Inc. v. U.D. Electronic Corp. Plaintiff S.D. Cal. 27 Aug 2020 228 d Procedural Outcome
2020-2177 U.D. Electronic Corp. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 20 Aug 2020 315 d Closed
2020-2129 Pulse Electronics, Inc. v. U.D. Electronic Corp. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 6 Aug 2020 329 d Closed
3:18-cv-00373 Pulse Electronics, Inc. v. U.D. Electronic Corp. Plaintiff S.D. Cal. 16 Feb 2018 1139 d Judgment on the Merits
2016-2006 Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 6 May 2016 385 d Closed
15-121 Pulse Electronics, Inc. v. Halo Electronics, Inc. Plaintiff U.S. Supreme Court 28 Jul 2015 69 d Appeal Denied
2013-1656 Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 17 Sep 2013 1053 d Closed
2013-1472 Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 26 Jun 2013 1136 d Closed
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Pulse Electronics, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Pulse Electronics is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.