Pure Data Systems, LLC | Patent Litigation Record

13 cases on record

Cases on record: 13
As claimant: 13
As respondent: 0
Patents held: Not recorded
Core tech: G06F17/30

Case no.	Parties	Role	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
3:18-cv-05343	Pure Data Systems, LLC v. Electronic Arts, Inc	Plaintiff	N.D. Cal.	30 Aug 2018	76 d	Likely Settlement
1:18-cv-00771	Pure Data Systems, LLC v. Pandora Media, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	18 May 2018	259 d	Likely Settlement
1:18-cv-00772	Pure Data Systems, LLC v. Spotify USA, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	18 May 2018	231 d	Likely Settlement
2:18-cv-01097	Pure Data Systems, LLC v. Electronic Arts, Inc	Plaintiff	C.D. Cal.	8 Feb 2018	201 d	Case Transferred
3:18-cv-00852	Pure Data Systems, LLC v. Ubisoft, Inc.	Plaintiff	N.D. Cal.	8 Feb 2018	285 d	Likely Settlement
1:17-cv-01585	Pure Data Systems, LLC v. Imgur, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	3 Nov 2017	32 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-01586	Pure Data Systems, LLC v. Mercari, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	3 Nov 2017	32 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-01587	Pure Data Systems, LLC v. Pinterest, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	3 Nov 2017	32 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:17-cv-01659	Pure Data Systems, LLC v. Valve Corporation	Plaintiff	W.D. Wash.	3 Nov 2017	97 d	Likely Settlement
1:17-cv-00876	Pure Data Systems, LLC v. EnterpriseDB, Corp.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	30 Jun 2017	144 d	Likely Settlement
6:17-cv-00209	Pure Data Systems, LLC v. CNN Interactive Group, Inc.	Plaintiff	E.D. Tex.	10 Apr 2017	93 d	Voluntary dismissal
6:17-cv-00210	Pure Data Systems, LLC v. CNET Networks, Inc.	Plaintiff	E.D. Tex.	10 Apr 2017	93 d	Voluntary dismissal
6:17-cv-00211	Pure Data Systems, LLC v. Fox News Network, LLC	Plaintiff	E.D. Tex.	10 Apr 2017	93 d	Voluntary dismissal

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Pure Data Systems, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Pure Data Systems, LLC Patent litigation record

13 cases on record

See what Pure Data Systems is protecting