RingCentral, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 22 cases

22 cases on record naming RingCentral, Inc.: 2 as claimant, 20 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

22 cases on record

Cases on record
22
As claimant
2
As respondent
20
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H04L12/66 · H04M3/42 · H04M7/00 · H04W40/00 · H04W4/90 · H04L29/06
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
7:25-cv-00305 CommWorks Solutions, LLC v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 9 Jul 2025 69 d Voluntary dismissal
1:24-cv-00993 WebSock Global Strategies, LLC v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 30 Aug 2024 48 d Voluntary dismissal
1:24-cv-00144 RecepTrexx, LLC v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 5 Feb 2024 86 d Voluntary dismissal
3:23-cv-06728 Missed Call, LLC v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 31 Dec 2023 71 d Voluntary dismissal
23-1241 Estech Systems, Inc v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 12 Dec 2022 158 d Voluntary dismissal
23-1242 Estech Systems, Inc v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 12 Dec 2022 639 d Unpatentable
1:22-cv-01334 Buffalo Patents, LLC v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 11 Oct 2022 156 d Voluntary dismissal
6:22-cv-01020 Marble VOIP Partners, LLC v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 30 Sep 2022 69 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-01681 Coretek Licensing, LLC v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 29 Nov 2021 231 d Voluntary dismissal
3:21-cv-02807 Zilkr Cloud Technologies, LLC v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant N.D. Tex. 11 Nov 2021 152 d Case Transferred
1:20-cv-02813 Protocol Conversion Solutions, LLC v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant D. Colo. 16 Sep 2020 35 d Voluntary dismissal
1:20-cv-00892 Valyrian IP, LLC v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant D. Colo. 1 Apr 2020 182 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-02329 Kaleasy Tech, LLC v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 22 Dec 2019 222 d Voluntary dismissal
5:19-cv-07735 Tekvoke, LLC v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 24 Nov 2019 197 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-00422 Wave Linx, LLC v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 28 Feb 2019 92 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-01917 Beck Branch, LLC v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 3 Dec 2018 43 d Voluntary dismissal
3:18-cv-06790 RingCentral, Inc. v. Bright Pattern, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 8 Nov 2018 130 d Voluntary dismissal
3:18-cv-05242 RingCentral, Inc. v. Dialpad, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 27 Aug 2018 316 d Voluntary dismissal
2:17-cv-00448 Mozly Tech, LLC v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 19 May 2017 125 d Voluntary dismissal
2:17-cv-00354 Uniloc, Corp. v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 25 Apr 2017 2443 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:16-cv-01354 Paluxy Messaging, LLC v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 5 Dec 2016 52 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00428 UrgenSync, LLC v. RingCentral, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 17 Apr 2015 62 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming RingCentral, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what RingCentral is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.