Sharp Electronics Corporation Patent litigation record

Company 19 cases

19 cases on record naming Sharp Electronics Corporation: 0 as claimant, 19 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

19 cases on record

Cases on record
19
As claimant
0
As respondent
19
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
6:23-cv-00183 Vdpp, LLC v. Sharp Electronics Corporation Defendant W.D. Tex. 10 Mar 2023 130 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-02780 Hydro Net, LLC v. Sharp Electronics Corporation Defendant S.D.N.Y. 31 Mar 2021 91 d Voluntary dismissal
2020-1041 Wi-Lan, Inc. v. Sharp Electronics Corporation Defendant Fed. Cir. 15 Oct 2019 539 d Closed
1:18-cv-00882 Epic IP, LLC v. Sharp Electronics, Corp. Defendant S.D.N.Y. 31 Jan 2018 337 d Likely Settlement
3:17-cv-02699 Iron Oak Technologies, LLC v. Sharp Electronics, Corp. Defendant N.D. Tex. 3 Oct 2017 513 d Stayed
2:16-cv-01247 Vesper Technology Research, LLC v. Sharp Electronics, Corp. Defendant E.D. Tex. 8 Nov 2016 127 d Out-of-court Settlement
6:16-cv-00957 Pico Byte Systems, LLC v. Sharp Electronics Corporation Defendant E.D. Tex. 29 Jun 2016 217 d Likely Settlement
1:16-cv-00446 North Star Innovations, Inc. v. Sharp Electronics, Corp. Defendant D. Del. 16 Jun 2016 61 d Voluntary dismissal
2:15-cv-01925 Iris Connex, LLC v. Sharp Electronics Corporation Defendant E.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2015 277 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00972 Lone Star Technological Innovations, LLC v. Sharp Electronics Corporation Defendant E.D. Tex. 10 Nov 2015 505 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01610 Sockeye Licensing TX, LLC v. Sharp Electronics Corporation Defendant E.D. Tex. 5 Oct 2015 23 d Voluntary dismissal
2:15-cv-01493 Carnition, LLC v. Sharp Electronics Corporation Defendant E.D. Tex. 3 Sep 2015 91 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01113 Morpho Komodo, LLC v. Sharp Electronics Corporation Defendant E.D. Tex. 22 Jun 2015 315 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00701 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Sharp Electronics Corporation Defendant E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 89 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-00619 Nonend Inventions, N.V. v. Sharp Electronics Corporation Defendant E.D. Tex. 1 May 2015 292 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-00168 Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Sharp Electronics Corporation Defendant E.D. Tex. 6 Feb 2015 95 d Other
1:15-cv-00008 Adaptive Data, LLC v. Sharp Electronics Corporation Defendant D. Del. 5 Jan 2015 18 d Voluntary dismissal
2:14-cv-01154 Dynamic Hosting Company, LLC v. Sharp Electronics Corporation Defendant E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 193 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:13-cv-00993 Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Sharp Electronics Corporation Defendant E.D. Tex. 21 Nov 2013 567 d Out-of-court Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Sharp Electronics Corporation in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Sharp Electronics is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.