Solas OLED, Ltd. Patent litigation record

Company 24 cases

24 cases on record naming Solas OLED, Ltd.: 22 as claimant, 2 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

24 cases on record

Cases on record
24
As claimant
22
As respondent
2
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G01R27/26 · G01R31/28 · G01R1/073 · G06F3/0354 · G09G5/00 · H05B44/00 · G09G3/20 · G09G3/30 · H01L29/04 · H10D62/40 · H10K50/10 · H10K50/12 · G06K9/22 · G09G3/32 · H01L27/28 · H01L27/32 · G09G5/02 · H01L33/00 · H10P95/00 · G09F9/30 · H01L51/50 · G09F9/33
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2022-1309 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. Samsung Display Co., Ltd. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 28 Dec 2021 202 d Closed
6:21-cv-01268 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 7 Dec 2021 85 d Voluntary dismissal
2022-1185 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. Samsung Display Co., Ltd. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 24 Nov 2021 100 d Closed
2022-1013 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. Samsung Display Co., Ltd. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 5 Oct 2021 163 d Closed
1:21-cv-07201 Samsung Display Co., Ltd. v. Solas OLED, Ltd. Defendant S.D.N.Y. 26 Aug 2021 193 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-05205 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Solas OLED, Ltd. Defendant S.D.N.Y. 11 Jun 2021 425 d Voluntary dismissal
2:21-cv-00120 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 1 Apr 2021 4 d Other
2:21-cv-00121 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 1 Apr 2021 138 d Voluntary dismissal
2:21-cv-00104 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. Samsung Display Co., Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 22 Mar 2021 351 d Closed
2:21-cv-00105 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 22 Mar 2021 507 d Case Dismissed
6:21-cv-00185 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. Samsung Display Co., Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 26 Feb 2021 215 d Voluntary dismissal
337-TA-1243 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. BOE Technology America, Inc. Plaintiff United States International Trade Commission 2 Feb 2021 409 d Closed
337-TA-1225 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. Apple, Inc. Plaintiff United States International Trade Commission 28 Oct 2020 27 d Closed
2:20-cv-00307 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Sep 2020 540 d Voluntary dismissal
6:20-cv-00839 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. Lg Electronics, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 15 Sep 2020 156 d Voluntary dismissal
6:20-cv-00840 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. Apple, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 15 Sep 2020 115 d Voluntary dismissal
6:20-cv-00841 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. Dell Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 15 Sep 2020 113 d Voluntary dismissal
6:20-cv-00842 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. Motorola Mobility, LLC Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 15 Sep 2020 115 d Voluntary dismissal
6:19-cv-00631 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. HP, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 24 Oct 2019 291 d Voluntary dismissal
6:19-cv-00537 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. Apple, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 12 Sep 2019 496 d Voluntary dismissal
6:19-cv-00514 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. Dell Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 30 Aug 2019 531 d Likely Settlement
6:19-cv-00515 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. Google, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 30 Aug 2019 544 d Voluntary dismissal
2:19-cv-00152 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. Samsung Display Co., Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 2 May 2019 691 d Voluntary dismissal
6:19-cv-00236 Solas OLED, Ltd. v. LG Display Co., Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 1 Apr 2019 688 d Voluntary dismissal
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Solas OLED, Ltd. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Solas OLED is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.