Sony Electronics, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 20 cases

20 cases on record naming Sony Electronics, Inc.: 0 as claimant, 20 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

20 cases on record

Cases on record
20
As claimant
0
As respondent
20
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:24-cv-00893 e-Beacon LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 3 Nov 2024 75 d Voluntary dismissal
2:24-cv-00611 HyperQuery LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 31 Jul 2024 170 d Dismissed without Prejudice
6:21-cv-00151 Pineapple34, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 18 Feb 2021 11 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-01604 Magnacharge, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 17 Oct 2018 97 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-00675 Visual Effect Innovations, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 3 May 2018 228 d Likely Settlement
3:18-cv-00409 Lightwire, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant S.D. Cal. 22 Feb 2018 78 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-00283 Location Based Services, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 19 Feb 2018 372 d Likely Settlement
1:17-cv-01693 Realtime Adaptive Streaming, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 21 Nov 2017 349 d Likely Settlement
1:17-cv-01276 Visual Effect Innovations, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 6 Sep 2017 467 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00405 Rothschild Broadcast Distribution Systems, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 13 Apr 2016 155 d Likely Settlement
1:15-cv-00755 Micro Design, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 27 Aug 2015 147 d Voluntary dismissal
2:15-cv-01311 Packet Tread, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 17 Jul 2015 174 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01067 Oberalis, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 19 Jun 2015 125 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-00961 Magnacross, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 15 Oct 2014 208 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-05693 Nexus Display Technologies, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant C.D. Cal. 17 Jul 2014 235 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00174 SFA Systems, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 14 Mar 2014 321 d Likely Settlement
0:14-cv-00628 Imation Corporation v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant D. Minn. 10 Mar 2014 1281 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01384 Advanced eScreens, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 2 Aug 2013 675 d Likely Settlement
2:12-cv-02828 B.E. Technology, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tenn. 21 Sep 2012 1946 d Likely Settlement
1:12-cv-00398 HumanEyes Technologies, Ltd. v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 29 Mar 2012 1443 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Sony Electronics, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Sony Electronics is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.