Spin Master, Ltd. Patent litigation record

Company 19 cases

19 cases on record naming Spin Master, Ltd.: 9 as claimant, 10 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

19 cases on record

Cases on record
19
As claimant
9
As respondent
10
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
A63H33/26 · A63H33/00 · A63H3/00 · A63H11/00 · A63H17/00 · A63H27/127 · A63H27/00 · A63H3/36 · A63H3/46
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
26-1236 Prime Time Toys LLC v. Spin Master, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 10 Dec 2025 75 d Closed
26-1238 Prime Time Toys LLC v. Spin Master, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 10 Dec 2025 75 d Closed
26-1239 Prime Time Toys LLC v. Spin Master, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 10 Dec 2025 75 d Closed
6:21-cv-00002 Advanced Aerodynamics, LLC v. Spin Master, Ltd. Defendant W.D. Tex. 4 Jan 2021 577 d Voluntary dismissal
2021-1348 Spin Master, Ltd. v. Choirock Contents Factory Co., Ltd. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 1 Dec 2020 315 d Closed
2021-1349 Spin Master, Ltd. v. Choirock Contents Factory Co., Ltd. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 1 Dec 2020 315 d Closed
2021-1350 Spin Master, Ltd. v. Choirock Contents Factory Co., Ltd. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 1 Dec 2020 315 d Closed
1:20-cv-01866 Spin Master, Ltd. v. World Tech Toys, Inc. Plaintiff S.D.N.Y. 3 Mar 2020 70 d Voluntary dismissal
6:20-cv-00066 Interactive Play Devices, LLC v. Spin Master, Ltd. Defendant W.D. Tex. 29 Jan 2020 483 d Voluntary dismissal
2020-1343 Spin Master, Ltd. v. E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 10 Jan 2020 60 d Closed
1:19-cv-09035 Spin Master, Ltd. v. E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. Plaintiff S.D.N.Y. 27 Sep 2019 161 d Voluntary dismissal
2:19-cv-02692 Odyssey Marking, Corp. v. Spin Master, Corp. Defendant C.D. Cal. 9 Apr 2019 94 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-03435 Spin Master, Ltd. v. Mattel, Inc. Plaintiff C.D. Cal. 24 Apr 2018 359 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-00573 Odyssey Marketing, Corp. v. Spin Master, Corp. Defendant D. Colo. 9 Mar 2018 320 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-01046 Spin Master, Ltd. v. Alpha Group US, LLC Plaintiff C.D. Cal. 7 Feb 2018 338 d Voluntary dismissal
2017-2589 Rehco, LLC v. Spin Master, Ltd. Defendant Fed. Cir. 25 Sep 2017 497 d Closed
1:17-cv-05428 Sphero, Inc. v. Spin Master, Ltd. Defendant S.D.N.Y. 18 Jul 2017 73 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-01186 Spin Master, Ltd. v. Hellodiscountstore.com Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 19 Oct 2016 29 d Other
1:13-cv-02245 Rehco, LLC v. Spin Master, Ltd. Defendant N.D. Ill. 26 Mar 2013 1613 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Spin Master, Ltd. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Spin Master is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.