Square, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 14 cases

14 cases on record naming Square, Inc.: 1 as claimant, 13 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

14 cases on record

Cases on record
14
As claimant
1
As respondent
13
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:21-cv-05463 AuthWallet, LLC v. Square, Inc. Defendant S.D.N.Y. 22 Jun 2021 315 d Judgment on the Merits
2021-1979 4361423 Canada, Inc. v. Square, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 28 May 2021 27 d Closed
2021-1980 4361423 Canada, Inc. v. Square, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 28 May 2021 27 d Closed
1:20-cv-01317 Kwality IP, LLC v. Square, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 29 Sep 2020 101 d Voluntary dismissal
3:19-cv-07813 Scanning Technologies Innovations, LLC v. Square, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 27 Nov 2019 72 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-03733 SendSig, LLC v. Square, Inc. Defendant N.D. Ga. 19 Aug 2019 429 d Voluntary dismissal
4:19-cv-04311 4361423 Canada, Inc. v. Square, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 26 Jul 2019 698 d Voluntary dismissal
5:18-cv-00183 PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Square, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 9 Jan 2018 1024 d Closed
2:17-cv-00150 Digital Verification Systems, LLC v. Square, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 23 Feb 2017 103 d Voluntary dismissal
2:15-cv-01928 eCeipt, LLC v. Square, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2015 113 d Likely Settlement
3:14-cv-03423 Square, Inc. v. Protegrity Corporation Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 28 Jul 2014 289 d Procedural Outcome
3:14-cv-01374 Think Computer Corporation v. Square, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 25 Mar 2014 1625 d Likely Settlement
3:13-cv-00579 Unwired Planet, LLC v. Square, Inc. Defendant D. Nev. 20 Oct 2013 894 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-06445 eCharge Licensing, LLC v. Square, Inc. Defendant N.D. Ill. 9 Sep 2013 630 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Square, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Square is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.