71 cases on record
- Cases on record
- 71
- As claimant
- 1
- As respondent
- 70
- Patents held
- Not recorded
- Core tech
- Not recorded
| Case no. | Parties | Role | Court | Filed | Duration | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2:26-cv-00173 | Vdpp, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 2 Mar 2026 | 122 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:25-cv-00963 | Headwater Research, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 18 Sep 2025 | 355 d | Case Dismissed |
| 2:25-cv-00527 | Content Aware, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 14 May 2025 | 98 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:25-cv-00299 | AR Design Innovations, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 13 Mar 2025 | 83 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:25-cv-00283 | Smart Order LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 10 Mar 2025 | 51 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:24-cv-01764 | Pizza Pack, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | D. Or. | 18 Oct 2024 | 292 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 24-1545 | Innovaport LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | Fed. Cir. | 6 Mar 2024 | 702 d | Closed |
| 2:23-cv-00330 | Ministrap, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 14 Jul 2023 | 515 d | Case Dismissed |
| 3:23-cv-03172 | Design Ideas, Ltd. v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | C.D. Ill. | 15 May 2023 | 792 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 2:23-cv-00036 | Flying Heliball, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 31 Jan 2023 | 609 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 1:23-cv-00005 | Socket Solutions, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | N.D. Ill. | 2 Jan 2023 | 25 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:22-cv-06814 | Consolidated Transaction Processing, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | N.D. Ill. | 5 Dec 2022 | 49 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:22-cv-00175 | Lexos Media IP, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 25 May 2022 | 601 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 2:22-cv-00115 | Solo Brands, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 15 Apr 2022 | 126 d | Case Dismissed |
| 6:22-cv-00173 | M4siz Limited v. Target Corporation | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 18 Feb 2022 | 68 d | Closed |
| 22-1338 | Proxicom Wireless, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | Fed. Cir. | 7 Jan 2022 | 621 d | Appeal Dismissed in Part |
| 22-1339 | Proxicom Wireless, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | Fed. Cir. | 7 Jan 2022 | 621 d | Appeal Dismissed in Part |
| 6:21-cv-01381 | Bassfield IP, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 30 Dec 2021 | 35 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 22-1283 | Target, Corp. v. Proxicom Wireless, LLC | Plaintiff | Fed. Cir. | 21 Dec 2021 | 638 d | Appeal Dismissed in Part |
| 6:21-cv-01075 | Linfo IP, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 15 Oct 2021 | 115 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:21-cv-00276 | Optinetix, Inc. v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 4 Jun 2021 | 242 d | Likely Settlement |
| 4:21-cv-00408 | Implicit, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 28 May 2021 | 175 d | Out-of-court Settlement |
| 2021-1725 | Dyfan, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | Fed. Cir. | 10 Mar 2021 | 379 d | Closed |
| 21-1725 | Dyfan, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | Fed. Cir. | 10 Mar 2021 | 379 d | Reversed and Remanded |
| 6:21-cv-00114 | Dyfan, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 2 Feb 2021 | 447 d | Other |
| 4:21-cv-00092 | R2 Solutions, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 29 Jan 2021 | 242 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:20-cv-00405 | NorthStar Systems, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 30 Dec 2020 | 119 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 6:20-cv-01120 | Interactive Play Devices, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 9 Dec 2020 | 148 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:20-cv-00362 | Lennon Image Technologies, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 13 Nov 2020 | 384 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 6:20-cv-00879 | Proxense, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 28 Sep 2020 | 590 d | Closed |
| 3:20-cv-03231 | Design Ideas, Ltd. v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | C.D. Ill. | 4 Sep 2020 | 1775 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 2:20-cv-07708 | Savvier Fitness, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | C.D. Cal. | 24 Aug 2020 | 577 d | Closed |
| 2:20-cv-00123 | Estech Systems, Inc v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 24 Apr 2020 | 572 d | Likely Settlement |
| 4:20-cv-00239 | Magnacharge, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 23 Mar 2020 | 255 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 4:20-cv-00026 | Hailo Technologies, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | S.D. Tex. | 4 Jan 2020 | 75 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:19-cv-01167 | Launchip, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 27 Nov 2019 | 177 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 6:19-cv-01886 | Proxicom Wireless, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | M.D. Fla. | 2 Oct 2019 | 261 d | Likely Settlement |
| 2:19-cv-06572 | The Regents of the University Of California v. Target Corporation | Defendant | C.D. Cal. | 30 Jul 2019 | 471 d | Stayed |
| 2:19-cv-06552 | Virco Mfg., Corp. v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | C.D. Cal. | 29 Jul 2019 | 78 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 6:19-cv-00338 | Vindolor, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 30 May 2019 | 125 d | Likely Settlement |
| 2:19-cv-00163 | Universal Cipher, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 7 May 2019 | 122 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:19-cv-03556 | Funrise, Inc. v. Target Corporation | Defendant | C.D. Cal. | 29 Apr 2019 | 263 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:19-cv-00100 | Team Worldwide Corporation v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 21 Mar 2019 | 1887 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 6:19-cv-00179 | Dyfan, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 28 Feb 2019 | 1555 d | Dismissed without Prejudice |
| 2:19-cv-00019 | Flectere, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 18 Jan 2019 | 73 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:18-cv-00770 | Restoration Hardware, Inc. v. Target Corporation | Defendant | N.D. Cal. | 5 Feb 2018 | 10 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:17-cv-02417 | RevoLaze, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | N.D. Ohio | 20 Nov 2017 | 371 d | Likely Settlement |
| 0:17-cv-05012 | QFO Labs, Inc. v. Target Corporation | Defendant | D. Minn. | 3 Nov 2017 | 1776 d | Likely Settlement |
| 5:17-cv-04309 | MCS Industries, Inc. v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | E.D. Pa. | 27 Sep 2017 | 61 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 6:17-cv-00542 | Jumpsport, Inc. v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 22 Sep 2017 | 249 d | Likely Settlement |
| 2:17-cv-00633 | Electronic Receipts Delivery Systems, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 6 Sep 2017 | 77 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:17-cv-00625 | Interactive Play Devices, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 31 Aug 2017 | 484 d | Likely Settlement |
| 4:17-cv-00612 | Shoes By Firebug, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 31 Aug 2017 | 768 d | Stayed |
| 2:17-cv-00307 | Soverain IP, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 12 Apr 2017 | 127 d | Likely Settlement |
| 2:16-cv-06925 | Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Target Corporation | Defendant | C.D. Cal. | 14 Sep 2016 | 288 d | Likely Settlement |
| 1:16-cv-00484 | Digital Audio Encoding Systems, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | D. Del. | 23 Jun 2016 | 166 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:16-cv-00381 | Location Services IP, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 8 Apr 2016 | 5 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:16-cv-02082 | WP Banquet, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | C.D. Cal. | 28 Mar 2016 | 338 d | Likely Settlement |
| 8:15-cv-02799 | Nextcard, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | M.D. Fla. | 4 Dec 2015 | 83 d | Out-of-court Settlement |
| 1:15-cv-09320 | GoTech, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | S.D.N.Y. | 25 Nov 2015 | 111 d | Out-of-court Settlement |
| 2:15-cv-01746 | CryptoPeak Solutions, LLC v. Target, Corp. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 9 Nov 2015 | 36 d | Likely Settlement |
| 2:15-cv-01279 | CDR Printing, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 16 Jul 2015 | 125 d | Likely Settlement |
| 2:15-cv-01068 | Oberalis, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 19 Jun 2015 | 77 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:15-cv-00762 | Loramax LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 15 May 2015 | 77 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:15-cv-00768 | Tangelo IP, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 15 May 2015 | 287 d | Likely Settlement |
| 2:15-cv-00259 | Orostream, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 23 Feb 2015 | 170 d | Likely Settlement |
| 2:15-cv-00091 | Coqui Technologies, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 28 Jan 2015 | 180 d | Likely Settlement |
| 2:14-cv-00193 | Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 7 Mar 2014 | 361 d | Likely Settlement |
| 6:13-cv-00570 | Clear With Computers, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 2 Aug 2013 | 619 d | Likely Settlement |
| 2:12-cv-05680 | Destination Maternity Corporation v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Pa. | 4 Oct 2012 | 925 d | Procedural Outcome |
| 2:11-cv-03350 | Worldslide, LLC v. Target Corporation | Defendant | E.D. Cal. | 16 Dec 2011 | 1146 d | Likely Settlement |
See what Target is protecting
Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Analyse this portfolio- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.
Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.
Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.
Report an incorrect record
Tell us what is wrong on this page. The page address is included automatically.
Privacy request
For requests about your personal information on this page. The page address is included automatically.