Techno Licensing, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 18 cases

18 cases on record naming Techno Licensing, LLC: 18 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

18 cases on record

Cases on record
18
As claimant
18
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H04B7/00 · H04M3/42 · H04L12/70 · H04M3/00
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
5:18-cv-07287 Techno Licensing, LLC v. Teamspeak Systems, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 30 Nov 2018 82 d Likely Settlement
2:18-cv-00370 Techno Licensing, LLC v. Bluebird USA, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Wash. 29 Nov 2018 125 d Voluntary dismissal
0:18-cv-62890 Techno Licensing, LLC v. Kirisun Americas, LLC Plaintiff S.D. Fla. 28 Nov 2018 139 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-01870 Techno Licensing, LLC v. Sonim Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 26 Nov 2018 108 d Voluntary dismissal
4:18-cv-04429 Techno Licensing, LLC v. Pepperl + Fuchs, Inc. Plaintiff S.D. Tex. 20 Nov 2018 122 d Out-of-court Settlement
4:18-cv-04430 Techno Licensing, LLC v. Unitech Amercia, Inc. Plaintiff S.D. Tex. 20 Nov 2018 93 d Likely Settlement
1:18-cv-06505 Techno Licensing, LLC v. Dillon Kane Group, LLC Plaintiff N.D. Ill. 25 Sep 2018 125 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-06506 Techno Licensing, LLC v. Zebra Technologies Corporation Plaintiff N.D. Ill. 25 Sep 2018 88 d Voluntary dismissal
3:18-cv-02559 Techno Licensing, LLC v. NEC Corporation of America Plaintiff N.D. Tex. 25 Sep 2018 72 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-00405 Techno Licensing, LLC v. Simoco Emea, Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 24 Sep 2018 78 d Voluntary dismissal
3:18-cv-00581 Techno Licensing, LLC v. Cellular South, Inc. Plaintiff S.D. Miss. 23 Aug 2018 95 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-00266 Techno Licensing, LLC v. AT&T, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 26 Jun 2018 20 d Likely Settlement
1:18-cv-00903 Techno Licensing, LLC v. Telus Communications, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 18 Jun 2018 53 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-00662 Techno Licensing, LLC v. Verizon Communications, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 30 Apr 2018 113 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-01012 Techno Licensing, LLC v. Airbus Defense & Space, Inc. Plaintiff D. Colo. 30 Apr 2018 121 d Likely Settlement
1:17-cv-07133 Techno Licensing, LLC v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Ill. 3 Oct 2017 66 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-01357 Techno Licensing, LLC v. Harris Corporation Plaintiff D. Del. 26 Sep 2017 80 d Voluntary dismissal
2:17-cv-00667 Techno Licensing, LLC v. Tait North America, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 26 Sep 2017 177 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Techno Licensing, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Techno Licensing is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.