Telsync Technologies, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 17 cases

17 cases on record naming Telsync Technologies, LLC: 17 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

17 cases on record

Cases on record
17
As claimant
17
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H04W56/00 · H04W8/24 · H04W4/00 · H04N5/232 · H04W4/02 · H04W64/00
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:26-cv-00539 Telsync Technologies, LLC v. Druid Software Limited Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 2 Jul 2026 53 d Dismissed without Prejudice
2:26-cv-00540 Telsync Technologies, LLC v. Ribbon Communications, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 2 Jul 2026 70 d Voluntary dismissal
8:25-cv-01316 Telsync Technologies, Inc. v. GL Communications Inc. Plaintiff D. Md. 23 Apr 2025 306 d Closed
1:25-cv-00473 Telsync Technologies, LLC v. GE Vernova Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 17 Apr 2025 103 d Case Dismissed
2:25-cv-00364 Telsync Technologies, LLC v. Viavi Solutions, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 9 Apr 2025 131 d Dismissed with Prejudice
7:25-cv-00150 Telsync Technologies, LLC v. Siemens, Corp. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 1 Apr 2025 66 d Voluntary dismissal
2:24-cv-00297 Telsync Technologies, LLC v. Ericsson, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 1 May 2024 72 d Voluntary dismissal
2:24-cv-00298 Telsync Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 1 May 2024 139 d Voluntary dismissal
6:24-cv-00227 Telsync Technologies, LLC v. T-Mobile Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 1 May 2024 160 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00294 Telsync Technologies, LLC v. Accenture Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Apr 2024 848 d Case Dismissed
2:24-cv-00295 Telsync Technologies, LLC v. AT&T, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Apr 2024 140 d Voluntary dismissal
6:23-cv-00625 Telsync Technologies, LLC v. Central Texas Telephone Investments, LP Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 25 Aug 2023 76 d Case Dismissed
6:23-cv-00626 Telsync Technologies, LLC v. Colorado Valley Celltel, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 25 Aug 2023 40 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:23-cv-00627 Telsync Technologies, LLC v. Mavenir, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 25 Aug 2023 70 d Voluntary dismissal
6:23-cv-00629 Telsync Technologies, LLC v. West Central Wireless Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 25 Aug 2023 76 d Case Dismissed
6:23-cv-00631 Telsync Technologies, LLC v. WiFires Communications, LLC Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 25 Aug 2023 74 d Voluntary dismissal
6:23-cv-00624 Telsync Technologies, LLC v. AMG Technology Investment Group, LLC Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 24 Aug 2023 41 d Case Dismissed
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Telsync Technologies, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Telsync Technologies is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.