Time Warner Cable, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 19 cases

19 cases on record naming Time Warner Cable, Inc.: 2 as claimant, 17 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

19 cases on record

Cases on record
19
As claimant
2
As respondent
17
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
19-211 Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. Sprint Communication Company, LP Plaintiff U.S. Supreme Court 19 Aug 2019 77 d Appeal Denied
2017-2247 Sprint Communication Company, LP v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 29 Jun 2017 627 d Closed
3:16-cv-02433 Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. Opentv, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 4 May 2016 90 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00007 Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 4 Jan 2016 218 d MDL Transfer
1:15-cv-00852 ChanBond, LLC v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 21 Sep 2015 2121 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-06805 Global Interactive Media, Inc. v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. Defendant S.D.N.Y. 27 Aug 2015 193 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-00615 TQ Delta, LLC v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 17 Jul 2015 523 d Stayed
2:15-cv-01281 CDR Printing, LLC v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 16 Jul 2015 112 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00139 Clarus Data, Inc. v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 28 Apr 2015 499 d Other
1:14-cv-00524 Joao Control & Monitoring Systems, LLC v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 23 Apr 2014 698 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-00059 C-Cation Technologies, LLC v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 4 Feb 2014 1430 d Procedural Outcome
1:13-cv-02068 Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 20 Dec 2013 859 d Judgment on the Merits
2:13-cv-01079 Constellation Technologies, LLC v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 11 Dec 2013 415 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01425 Custom Media Technologies, LLC v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 15 Aug 2013 676 d Out-of-court Settlement
1:13-cv-00855 FutureVision.com, LLC v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 16 May 2013 1021 d Judgment on the Merits
1:12-cv-01740 Trans Video Electronics, Ltd. v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 20 Dec 2012 909 d Out-of-court Settlement
1:12-cv-01692 AIP Acquisition, LLC v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 11 Dec 2012 1100 d Voluntary dismissal
2:11-cv-02686 Sprint Communication Company, LP v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. Defendant D. Kan. 19 Dec 2011 1912 d Judgment on the Merits
1:11-cv-00730 Bear Creek Technologies Inc. v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 17 Aug 2011 1357 d Procedural Outcome
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Time Warner Cable, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Time Warner Cable is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.