Topdown Licensing, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 18 cases

18 cases on record naming Topdown Licensing, LLC: 18 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

18 cases on record

Cases on record
18
As claimant
18
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G10H1/06 · G06F3/00 · G06F9/00 · G10H1/34 · G10H3/00
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:22-cv-05387 Topdown Licensing, LLC v. VTech Electronics North America, LLC Plaintiff N.D. Ill. 30 Sep 2022 122 d Consent Judgment
2:22-cv-05870 Topdown Licensing, LLC v. Zoom North America, LLC Plaintiff E.D.N.Y. 30 Sep 2022 165 d Voluntary dismissal
1:22-cv-01013 Topdown Licensing, LLC v. Qsc, LLC Plaintiff D. Del. 31 Jul 2022 57 d Closed
1:22-cv-00887 Topdown Licensing, LLC v. Focusrite Group US, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 30 Jun 2022 69 d Voluntary dismissal
1:22-cv-00432 Topdown Licensing, LLC v. IK Multimedia US, LLC Plaintiff D. Del. 31 Mar 2022 20 d Voluntary dismissal
1:22-cv-00433 Topdown Licensing, LLC v. Music Tribe Global Brands, Ltd. Plaintiff D. Del. 31 Mar 2022 155 d Voluntary dismissal
1:22-cv-00260 Topdown Licensing, LLC v. Arturia Corporation Plaintiff D. Del. 28 Feb 2022 53 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-01405 Topdown Licensing, LLC v. Mattel, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Oct 2021 62 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-01406 Topdown Licensing, LLC v. Survios, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Oct 2021 220 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-02425 Topdown Licensing, LLC v. Casio America, Inc. Plaintiff E.D.N.Y. 30 Apr 2021 112 d Voluntary dismissal
2:21-cv-02431 Topdown Licensing, LLC v. Korg U.S.A., Inc. Plaintiff E.D.N.Y. 30 Apr 2021 95 d Stayed
0:21-cv-60903 Topdown Licensing, LLC v. InMusic Brands, Inc. Plaintiff S.D. Fla. 28 Apr 2021 199 d Voluntary dismissal
4:20-cv-09481 Topdown Licensing, LLC v. Guillemot, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 31 Dec 2020 517 d Voluntary dismissal
1:20-cv-01791 Topdown Licensing, LLC v. Roland Corporation, US Plaintiff D. Del. 30 Dec 2020 404 d Likely Settlement
1:20-cv-00888 Topdown Licensing, LLC v. Ableton, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 30 Jun 2020 287 d Voluntary dismissal
1:20-cv-00889 Topdown Licensing, LLC v. Alphatheta Music Americas, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 30 Jun 2020 289 d Voluntary dismissal
1:20-cv-00890 Topdown Licensing, LLC v. Gibson Brands, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 30 Jun 2020 237 d Voluntary dismissal
2:20-cv-05800 Topdown Licensing, LLC v. Native Instruments North America, Inc. Plaintiff C.D. Cal. 29 Jun 2020 198 d Voluntary dismissal
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Topdown Licensing, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Topdown Licensing is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.