TransData, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 8 cases

8 cases on record naming TransData, Inc.: 8 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

8 cases on record

Cases on record
8
As claimant
8
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G01D4/00 · G01R22/00 · H01Q1/22 · H01Q9/04
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
6:16-cv-00407 TransData, Inc. v. Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 11 May 2016 76 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00848 TransData, Inc. v. General Electric Company Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 11 Sep 2015 115 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00849 TransData, Inc. v. Itron, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 11 Sep 2015 318 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00850 TransData, Inc. v. Landis+Gyr, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 11 Sep 2015 326 d Likely Settlement
3:11-cv-02529 TransData, Inc. v. San Diego Gas & Electric Company Plaintiff S.D. Cal. 31 Oct 2011 1724 d Likely Settlement
6:11-cv-00113 TransData, Inc. v. Denton County Electric Cooperative, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Mar 2011 1968 d Likely Settlement
6:11-cv-00046 TransData, Inc. v. Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 27 Jan 2011 1887 d Likely Settlement
6:10-cv-00557 TransData, Inc. v. Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 21 Oct 2010 2112 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming TransData, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what TransData is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.