35 cases on record
- Cases on record
- 35
- As claimant
- 2
- As respondent
- 33
- Patents held
- Not recorded
- Core tech
- G06Q10/06 · G06Q10/02 · G06Q30/02 · G06Q30/06
| Case no. | Parties | Role | Court | Filed | Duration | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7:25-cv-00498 | UpChat LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 28 Oct 2025 | 23 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 6:24-cv-00313 | e-Beacon LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 10 Jun 2024 | 65 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:24-cv-01178 | Yillio Inc v. Uber Technologies Inc | Defendant | N.D. Tex. | 16 May 2024 | 57 d | Dismissed without Prejudice |
| 24-1526 | Lbt IP II, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | Fed. Cir. | 28 Feb 2024 | 618 d | Unpatentable |
| 24-1457 | Lbt IP II, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | Fed. Cir. | 9 Feb 2024 | 637 d | Unpatentable |
| 5:23-cv-04549 | Enovsys, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | N.D. Cal. | 5 Sep 2023 | 664 d | Case Dismissed |
| 3:23-cv-00990 | WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | N.D. Cal. | 3 Mar 2023 | 91 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 6:22-cv-01060 | WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 7 Oct 2022 | 147 d | Case Transferred |
| 1:22-cv-00882 | SurgeTech, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | D. Del. | 29 Jun 2022 | 504 d | Case Dismissed |
| 6:22-cv-00317 | Fare Technologies, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 25 Mar 2022 | 354 d | Case Dismissed |
| 6:21-cv-01210 | Lbt IP II, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 19 Nov 2021 | 229 d | Case Transferred |
| 3:21-cv-07420 | Ikorongo Texas, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | N.D. Cal. | 23 Sep 2021 | 967 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 6:21-cv-00685 | Bluestone Ventures, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 29 Jun 2021 | 90 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:21-cv-00918 | Digi Portal, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | D. Del. | 28 Jun 2021 | 52 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:21-cv-00026 | Agis Software Development, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 29 Jan 2021 | 406 d | Closed |
| 6:20-cv-00843 | Ikorongo Texas, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 15 Sep 2020 | 372 d | Case Transferred |
| 6:20-cv-00785 | Mellaconic IP, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 27 Aug 2020 | 166 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 6:20-cv-00652 | GreatGigz Solutions, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 17 Jul 2020 | 90 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2020-1657 | X One, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | Fed. Cir. | 6 Apr 2020 | 388 d | Closed |
| 1:20-cv-00720 | Quartz Auto Technologies, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 18 Feb 2020 | 399 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 6:20-cv-00126 | Quartz Auto Technologies, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | W.D. Tex. | 18 Feb 2020 | 139 d | Case Transferred |
| 1:19-cv-02507 | RideApp, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | N.D. Ga. | 31 May 2019 | 158 d | Likely Settlement |
| 1:19-cv-00557 | Route Guidance Systems, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | D. Del. | 22 Mar 2019 | 245 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:19-cv-00561 | Blackbird Tech, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | D. Del. | 22 Mar 2019 | 403 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 4:19-cv-00219 | Mobile Networking Solutions, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | N.D. Cal. | 11 Jan 2019 | 161 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2019-1164 | Uber Technologies, Inc. v. X One, Inc. | Plaintiff | Fed. Cir. | 6 Nov 2018 | 546 d | Closed |
| 2019-1165 | Uber Technologies, Inc. v. X One, Inc. | Plaintiff | Fed. Cir. | 6 Nov 2018 | 483 d | Closed |
| 2:18-cv-00319 | Revolar Technology, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 27 Jul 2018 | 90 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 6:17-cv-00408 | Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 10 Jul 2017 | 364 d | Case Settled |
| 2:17-cv-03028 | Hailo Technologies, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | C.D. Cal. | 21 Apr 2017 | 126 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 5:16-cv-06050 | X One, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | N.D. Cal. | 19 Oct 2016 | 1218 d | Judgment on the Merits |
| 1:16-cv-00587 | Blackbird Tech, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | D. Del. | 8 Jul 2016 | 95 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:16-cv-00631 | Global Equity Management (SA) Pty., Ltd. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 14 Jun 2016 | 805 d | Likely Settlement |
| 6:15-cv-00685 | Rothschild Location Technologies, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 14 Jul 2015 | 107 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:15-cv-01208 | Location Services IP, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Defendant | E.D. Tex. | 1 Jul 2015 | 188 d | Out-of-court Settlement |
See what Uber Technologies is protecting
Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Analyse this portfolio- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.
Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.
Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.
Report an incorrect record
Tell us what is wrong on this page. The page address is included automatically.
Privacy request
For requests about your personal information on this page. The page address is included automatically.