Universal Transdata, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 20 cases

20 cases on record naming Universal Transdata, LLC: 20 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

20 cases on record

Cases on record
20
As claimant
20
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H01R13/44 · H01R13/453 · H01R31/06 · G06F13/00
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
5:19-cv-02649 Universal Transdata, LLC v. Lexar International Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 15 May 2019 184 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-02053 Universal Transdata, LLC v. Lenovo (United States), Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Dec 2018 140 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-04327 Universal Transdata, LLC v. Lenovo (United States), Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Ga. 14 Sep 2018 105 d Voluntary dismissal
5:18-cv-05363 Universal Transdata, LLC v. Silicon Power Computer & Communications USA, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 30 Aug 2018 89 d Voluntary dismissal
8:18-cv-01232 Universal Transdata, LLC v. Inland Products, Inc. Plaintiff C.D. Cal. 12 Jul 2018 130 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-06048 Universal Transdata, LLC v. Adesso, Inc. Plaintiff C.D. Cal. 11 Jul 2018 330 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-00405 Universal Transdata, LLC v. PC Gear Head, LLC Plaintiff M.D. Fla. 11 Jun 2018 77 d Case Settled
1:18-cv-02823 Universal Transdata, LLC v. Tecknet Online, Ltd. Plaintiff N.D. Ga. 8 Jun 2018 70 d Voluntary dismissal
8:18-cv-01353 Universal Transdata, LLC v. Deerbrook Electronics, LLC Plaintiff M.D. Fla. 5 Jun 2018 77 d Case Settled
1:18-cv-02245 Universal Transdata, LLC v. Anker Innovations, Ltd. Plaintiff N.D. Ga. 17 May 2018 225 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-00421 Universal Transdata, LLC v. Western Digital Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 19 Mar 2018 85 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-00344 Universal Transdata, LLC v. Razer USA, Ltd. Plaintiff D. Del. 2 Mar 2018 159 d Likely Settlement
1:17-cv-23346 Universal Transdata, LLC v. Transcend Information, Inc. Plaintiff S.D. Fla. 5 Sep 2017 93 d Out-of-court Settlement
1:17-cv-01237 Universal Transdata, LLC v. Ingram Micro, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 30 Aug 2017 49 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-01238 Universal Transdata, LLC v. Dexxxon Digital Storage, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 30 Aug 2017 197 d Likely Settlement
1:17-cv-01239 Universal Transdata, LLC v. Monster Digital, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 30 Aug 2017 147 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-01240 Universal Transdata, LLC v. Verbatim Americas, LLC Plaintiff D. Del. 30 Aug 2017 139 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-03285 Universal Transdata, LLC v. Staples, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Ga. 30 Aug 2017 189 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-03234 Universal Transdata, LLC v. Adata Technology Co., Ltd. Plaintiff N.D. Ga. 25 Aug 2017 144 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-03235 Universal Transdata, LLC v. Silicon Power Computer & Communication, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Ga. 25 Aug 2017 273 d Voluntary dismissal
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Universal Transdata, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Universal Transdata is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.