Visa, Inc. | Patent Litigation Record

14 cases on record

Cases on record: 14
As claimant: 5
As respondent: 9
Patents held: Not recorded
Core tech: Not recorded

Case no.	Parties	Role	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
1:24-cv-00244	Payvox, LLC v. Visa, Inc.	Defendant	D. Del.	23 Feb 2024	98 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
1:23-cv-00716	Liberty Peak Ventures, LLC v. Visa, Inc.	Defendant	W.D. Tex.	21 Jun 2023	107 d	Case Dismissed
6:23-cv-00048	Cortex MCP, Inc. v. Visa, Inc.	Defendant	W.D. Tex.	26 Jan 2023	281 d	Case Transferred
6:22-cv-00697	RFCyber, Corp. v. Visa, Inc.	Defendant	W.D. Tex.	28 Jun 2022	587 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
6:23-cv-00708	RFCyber, Corp. v. Visa, Inc.	Defendant	W.D. Tex.	28 Jun 2022	587 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
1:21-cv-01597	Auth Token, LLC v. Visa, Inc.	Defendant	D. Del.	11 Nov 2021	88 d	Voluntary dismissal
3:20-cv-04121	AuthWallet, LLC v. Visa, Inc.	Defendant	N.D. Cal.	22 Jun 2020	46 d	Voluntary dismissal
2020-1662	Visa, Inc. v. Universal Secure Registry, LLC	Plaintiff	Fed. Cir.	8 Apr 2020	506 d	Closed
2020-1397	Visa, Inc. v. Universal Secure Registry, LLC	Plaintiff	Fed. Cir.	27 Jan 2020	94 d	Closed
2020-1398	Visa, Inc. v. Universal Secure Registry, LLC	Plaintiff	Fed. Cir.	27 Jan 2020	94 d	Closed
2020-1243	Visa, Inc. v. Universal Secure Registry, LLC	Plaintiff	Fed. Cir.	11 Dec 2019	624 d	Closed
2020-1234	Visa, Inc. v. Universal Secure Registry, LLC	Plaintiff	Fed. Cir.	10 Dec 2019	625 d	Closed
1:18-cv-02074	Sapphire Crossing, LLC v. Visa, Inc.	Defendant	D. Del.	28 Dec 2018	306 d	Other
6:14-cv-00176	SFA Systems, LLC v. Visa, Inc.	Defendant	E.D. Tex.	14 Mar 2014	515 d	Likely Settlement

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Visa, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Visa, Inc. Patent litigation record

14 cases on record

See what Visa is protecting