Walgreen, Co. Patent litigation record

Company 33 cases

33 cases on record naming Walgreen, Co.: 0 as claimant, 33 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

33 cases on record

Cases on record
33
As claimant
0
As respondent
33
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:25-cv-00609 Nostromo, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant E.D. Tex. 6 Jun 2025 238 d Closed
2:25-cv-00120 Alpha Modus, Corp. v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant E.D. Tex. 3 Feb 2025 206 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:24-cv-13381 DataCloud Technologies, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant N.D. Ill. 31 Dec 2024 174 d Voluntary dismissal
2:24-cv-01069 S3G Technology, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant E.D. Tex. 20 Dec 2024 166 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00994 ContactWave LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant E.D. Tex. 2 Dec 2024 130 d Case Consolidated
2:24-cv-00899 Aml IP, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant E.D. Tex. 4 Nov 2024 18 d Voluntary dismissal
5:24-cv-01007 Milkmen Design, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant N.D. Ohio 13 Jun 2024 138 d Voluntary dismissal
6:24-cv-00031 Hyper Ice, Inc. v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant W.D. Tex. 16 Jan 2024 134 d Case Stayed
4:23-cv-01111 Comarco Wireless Systems, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant E.D. Tex. 15 Dec 2023 88 d Voluntary dismissal
4:23-cv-01078 Consolidated Transaction Processing, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant E.D. Tex. 6 Dec 2023 349 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:22-cv-23198 VoltStar Technologies, Inc. v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant S.D. Fla. 3 Oct 2022 57 d Voluntary dismissal
2:22-cv-00153 NorthStar Systems, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant E.D. Tex. 16 May 2022 128 d Voluntary dismissal
6:22-cv-00420 LedComm, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant W.D. Tex. 26 Apr 2022 211 d Voluntary dismissal
4:21-cv-00598 Implicit, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant E.D. Tex. 29 Jul 2021 97 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-00293 Optinetix, Inc. v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant E.D. Tex. 10 Jun 2021 236 d Likely Settlement
1:21-cv-00413 Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant W.D. Tex. 11 May 2021 8 d Voluntary dismissal
2:17-cv-00723 Veraseal, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant E.D. Tex. 1 Nov 2017 854 d Other
2017-2337 Advanced Marketing Systems, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant Fed. Cir. 25 Jul 2017 500 d Closed
2017-2338 Advanced Marketing Systems, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant Fed. Cir. 25 Jul 2017 500 d Closed
2017-2339 Advanced Marketing Systems, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant Fed. Cir. 25 Jul 2017 500 d Closed
2017-2288 Advanced Marketing Systems, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant Fed. Cir. 11 Jul 2017 514 d Closed
1:17-cv-02337 Sportbrain Holdings, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant N.D. Ill. 27 Mar 2017 71 d Other
6:16-cv-01283 Aeritas, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant E.D. Tex. 10 Nov 2016 103 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00382 Location Services IP, LLC v. Walgreen Company Defendant E.D. Tex. 8 Apr 2016 5 d Voluntary dismissal
2:15-cv-00971 NexusCard, Inc. v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant E.D. Tex. 5 Jun 2015 84 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-03970 American Needle, Inc. v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant N.D. Ill. 5 May 2015 119 d Voluntary dismissal
2:15-cv-00452 CDR Printing, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant E.D. Tex. 2 Apr 2015 228 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00136 Advanced Marketing Systems, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant E.D. Tex. 20 Feb 2015 0 d Other
6:15-cv-00137 Advanced Marketing Systems, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant E.D. Tex. 20 Feb 2015 480 d Stayed
1:15-cv-00103 Fo2go, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant D. Del. 27 Jan 2015 183 d Likely Settlement
2:13-cv-00670 Grand Overseas, Inc. v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant E.D. Tex. 22 Aug 2013 650 d Likely Settlement
2:13-cv-00631 MyMedicalRecords, Inc. v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant C.D. Cal. 29 Jan 2013 714 d Judgment on the Merits
6:12-cv-00153 Soverain Software, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Defendant E.D. Tex. 14 Mar 2012 1104 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Walgreen, Co. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Walgreen is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.