ImmerVision, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

24-2220 Fed. Cir. Closed

Appeal docketed 15 Aug 2024 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, involving a patent titled “Miniature wide-angle imaging lens” (US10795120B2). The case closed 11 Mar 2026.

View US10795120B2 in Patsnap Eureka Claims, drawings and current legal status

Case summary

Plaintiff
ImmerVision, Inc.
Defendant
Apple, Inc.
Patent involved
US10795120B2“Miniature wide-angle imaging lens”
Products listed
Miniature wide-angle imaging lens
Court
Fed. Cir.
Verdict cause
Patentability
Filed
15 Aug 2024
Closed
11 Mar 2026 (573 days)
Recorded category
Voluntary dismissal
Case no.
24-2220
Counsel of record · 7 attorneys, 2 firms
  • Dennis J. Butler I, plaintiff counsel
  • John David Simmons, plaintiff counsel
  • Keith Aaron Jones, plaintiff counsel
  • Stephen Emerson Murray, plaintiff counsel
  • Diva R. Hollis, defendant counsel
  • Jason M. Wilcox, defendant counsel
  • Stephen DeSalvo AT, defendant counsel
  • Plaintiff firm: Panitch Schwarze, Belisario & Nadel LLP
  • Defendant firm: Kirkland & Ellis, LLP
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Party, attorney and judge names are shown with standard capitalization; products and categories appear as recorded in the docket. Patent titles from Patsnap patent data.
Closing order

How the case ended

The parties, having so agreed, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The above-captioned appeal is dismissed under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) with each side to bear their own costs.

Case 24-2220 · Fed. Cir. · closed 11 March 2026 · Reproduced verbatim from the case record
The patents behind this order. Read the full claims of US10795120B2. Open in Patsnap Eureka
Before you launch

Check your product against patent claims

FTO Search in Patsnap Eureka finds patent claims relevant to your product’s technical features, so you can review them before launch.

Run an FTO Search
Monthly newsletter

Need a monthly report on closed US patent cases?

Every case that closed last month, with the court, the outcome and the patents involved.

Docket fields sourced from PACER via Patsnap Litigation Data. Patent bibliographic data from Patsnap.

General information only. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 24-2220 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. It does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.