US11998565B2 Patent litigation record

Patent 20 cases

US11998565B2 has been asserted in 20 cases on record. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

20 cases on record

Cases on record
20
Asserted by
American Regent
Asserted against
BPI Labs · Meitheal Pharmaceuticals · Amneal Pharmaceuticals · Somerset Therapeutics · Eugia Pharma Specialities · Fresenius Kabi · Accord Healthcare · Aspiro Pharma · Cipla · Dr. Reddy's Laboratories · Gland Pharma · Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA · Long Grove Pharmaceuticals · Rk Pharma · Sun Pharmaceutical Industries · Xiromed · Zydus Cadila
Courts
M.D. Fla. · D.N.J. · D. Del.
Technology
medicinal preparations
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
8:25-cv-01470 American Regent, Inc. v. BPI Labs, LLC M.D. Fla. 6 Jun 2025 18 d Dismissed without Prejudice
2:25-cv-04439 American Regent, Inc. v. BPI Labs, LLC D.N.J. 16 May 2025 81 d Consent Judgment
2:25-cv-01278 American Regent, Inc. v. Meitheal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. D.N.J. 14 Feb 2025 7 d Consent Judgment
2:24-cv-11503 American Regent, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. D.N.J. 30 Dec 2024 57 d Consent Judgment
2:24-cv-11138 American Regent, Inc. v. Somerset Therapeutics, LLC D.N.J. 13 Dec 2024 21 d Case Consolidated
2:24-cv-08956 American Regent, Inc. v. Eugia Pharma Specialities, Ltd. D.N.J. 5 Sep 2024 77 d Case Consolidated
1:24-cv-00824 American Regent, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi D. Del. 16 Jul 2024 141 d Consent Judgment
2:24-cv-07791 American Regent, Inc. v. Accord Healthcare, Ltd. D.N.J. 16 Jul 2024 511 d Consent Judgment
2:24-cv-07794 American Regent, Inc. v. Aspiro Pharma Ltd. D.N.J. 16 Jul 2024 128 d Case Consolidated
2:24-cv-07796 American Regent, Inc. v. Cipla Limited D.N.J. 16 Jul 2024 128 d Case Consolidated
2:24-cv-07799 American Regent, Inc. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. D.N.J. 16 Jul 2024 128 d Case Consolidated
2:24-cv-07801 American Regent, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi D.N.J. 16 Jul 2024 141 d Dismissed without Prejudice
2:24-cv-07802 American Regent, Inc. v. Gland Pharma, Ltd. D.N.J. 16 Jul 2024 128 d Case Consolidated
2:24-cv-07803 American Regent, Inc. v. Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. D.N.J. 16 Jul 2024 128 d Case Consolidated
2:24-cv-07804 American Regent, Inc. v. Long Grove Pharmaceuticals, LLC D.N.J. 16 Jul 2024 128 d Case Consolidated
2:24-cv-07805 American Regent, Inc. v. Rk Pharma, Inc. D.N.J. 16 Jul 2024 128 d Case Consolidated
2:24-cv-07807 American Regent, Inc. v. Somerset Therapeutics, LLC D.N.J. 16 Jul 2024 128 d Case Consolidated
2:24-cv-07810 American Regent, Inc. v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. D.N.J. 16 Jul 2024 128 d Case Consolidated
2:24-cv-07811 American Regent, Inc. v. Xiromed, LLC D.N.J. 16 Jul 2024 128 d Case Consolidated
2:24-cv-07812 American Regent, Inc. v. Zydus Cadila D.N.J. 16 Jul 2024 128 d Case Consolidated
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US11998565B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

How strong is US11998565B2?

Closest prior art, compared claim by claim, with every reference rated for how hard it hits.

Run a novelty search
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.