US5490216A Patent litigation record

Patent 20 cases

US5490216A has been asserted in 20 cases on record. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Analyse this patent in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

20 cases on record

Cases on record
20
Asserted by
Kofax · Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. · Uniloc USA
Asserted against
Uniloc USA · Electronic Arts · Corel · SDL International America · Altova · Cambium Learning Group · Canon U.S.A. · Chief Architect · Edgewater Marine Industries · Juniper Networks · Kofax · Native Instruments North America · Perfect World Entertainment · Comodo Group · Kaspersky Lab · Trend Micro · AVG Technologies USA · Ubisoft · Ipswitch · PerkinElmer
Courts
Fed. Cir. · E.D. Tex.
Technology
electric digital data processing
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2016-2407 Kofax, Inc. v. Uniloc USA, Inc. Fed. Cir. 1 Aug 2016 99 d Closed
2015-1679 Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. v. Electronic Arts, Inc Fed. Cir. 28 May 2015 257 d Closed
6:14-cv-00572 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Corel, Inc. E.D. Tex. 23 Jun 2014 1409 d Voluntary dismissal
6:14-cv-00575 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. SDL International America Incorporated E.D. Tex. 23 Jun 2014 1409 d Voluntary dismissal
6:14-cv-00418 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Altova, Inc. E.D. Tex. 6 May 2014 1525 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00419 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Cambium Learning Group, Inc. E.D. Tex. 6 May 2014 1457 d Voluntary dismissal
6:14-cv-00420 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Canon U.S.A., Inc. E.D. Tex. 6 May 2014 1464 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00421 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Chief Architect, Inc. E.D. Tex. 6 May 2014 1030 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00423 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Edgewater Marine Industries, LLC E.D. Tex. 6 May 2014 1457 d Voluntary dismissal
6:14-cv-00426 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc. E.D. Tex. 6 May 2014 1477 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00427 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Kofax, Inc. E.D. Tex. 6 May 2014 1457 d Voluntary dismissal
6:14-cv-00428 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Native Instruments North America, Inc. E.D. Tex. 6 May 2014 1569 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00429 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Perfect World Entertainment, Inc. E.D. Tex. 6 May 2014 1617 d Case Dismissed
6:13-cv-00794 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Comodo Group, Inc. E.D. Tex. 18 Oct 2013 1686 d Likely Settlement
6:13-cv-00795 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Kaspersky Lab, Inc. E.D. Tex. 18 Oct 2013 1788 d Likely Settlement
6:13-cv-00798 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated E.D. Tex. 18 Oct 2013 1664 d Likely Settlement
6:13-cv-00626 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. AVG Technologies USA, Inc. E.D. Tex. 6 Sep 2013 1859 d Case Dismissed
6:13-cv-00628 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Ubisoft, Inc. E.D. Tex. 6 Sep 2013 1721 d Likely Settlement
6:13-cv-00367 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Ipswitch, Inc. E.D. Tex. 1 May 2013 1840 d Likely Settlement
6:12-cv-01015 Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. v. PerkinElmer, Inc. E.D. Tex. 27 Dec 2012 1217 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US5490216A in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

How strong is US5490216A?

Closest prior art, compared claim by claim, with every reference rated for how hard it hits.

Run a novelty search
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.