US5999927A Patent litigation record

Patent 22 cases

US5999927A has been asserted in 22 cases on record. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Analyse this patent in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

22 cases on record

Cases on record
22
Asserted by
Genaville
Asserted against
Caleres · The Children's Place Retail Stores · The Container Store Group · GameFly · General Nutrition Centers · The Home Depot U.S.A. · O'Reilly Automotive · Ralph Lauren · School Specialty · Systemax · AT&T · Rakuten USA · Fanatics · Follett Higher Education Group · JP Boden USA · Kohl's Illinois · Lowe's Companies · The Men's Wearhouse · MLB Advanced Media, LP · Opticsplanet · PC Connection · Recreational Equipment
Courts
E.D. Tex.
Technology
electric digital data processing
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
5:15-cv-00077 Genaville, LLC v. Caleres, Inc. E.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2015 82 d Voluntary dismissal
5:15-cv-00078 Genaville, LLC v. The Children's Place Retail Stores, Inc. E.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2015 72 d Voluntary dismissal
5:15-cv-00080 Genaville, LLC v. The Container Store Group, Inc. E.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2015 82 d Voluntary dismissal
5:15-cv-00081 Genaville, LLC v. GameFly, Inc. E.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2015 222 d Likely Settlement
5:15-cv-00082 Genaville, LLC v. General Nutrition Centers, Inc. E.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2015 72 d Voluntary dismissal
5:15-cv-00084 Genaville, LLC v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. E.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2015 108 d Voluntary dismissal
5:15-cv-00087 Genaville, LLC v. O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. E.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2015 222 d Likely Settlement
5:15-cv-00089 Genaville, LLC v. Ralph Lauren Corporation E.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2015 82 d Voluntary dismissal
5:15-cv-00092 Genaville, LLC v. School Specialty, Inc. E.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2015 171 d Likely Settlement
5:15-cv-00094 Genaville, LLC v. Systemax, Inc. E.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2015 80 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00863 Genaville, LLC v. AT&T, Inc. E.D. Tex. 28 May 2015 365 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00865 Genaville, LLC v. Rakuten USA, Inc. E.D. Tex. 28 May 2015 221 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00868 Genaville, LLC v. Fanatics, Inc. E.D. Tex. 28 May 2015 125 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-00869 Genaville, LLC v. Follett Higher Education Group, Inc. E.D. Tex. 28 May 2015 253 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00873 Genaville, LLC v. JP Boden USA, LLC E.D. Tex. 28 May 2015 74 d Voluntary dismissal
2:15-cv-00874 Genaville, LLC v. Kohl's Illinois, Inc. E.D. Tex. 28 May 2015 116 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-00876 Genaville, LLC v. Lowe's Companies, Inc. E.D. Tex. 28 May 2015 159 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-00877 Genaville, LLC v. The Men's Wearhouse, Inc. E.D. Tex. 28 May 2015 159 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00879 Genaville, LLC v. MLB Advanced Media, LP E.D. Tex. 28 May 2015 245 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00885 Genaville, LLC v. Opticsplanet, Inc. E.D. Tex. 28 May 2015 143 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00886 Genaville, LLC v. PC Connection, Inc. E.D. Tex. 28 May 2015 125 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-00888 Genaville, LLC v. Recreational Equipment, Inc. E.D. Tex. 28 May 2015 292 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US5999927A in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

How strong is US5999927A?

Closest prior art, compared claim by claim, with every reference rated for how hard it hits.

Run a novelty search
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.