US6430603B2 Patent litigation record

Patent 22 cases

US6430603B2 has been asserted in 22 cases on record. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Analyse this patent in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

22 cases on record

Cases on record
22
Asserted by
T-Rex Property, Ab · Broadsign International
Asserted against
Admirable · Four Winds Interactive · Barco · Quality Systems Technology · Clear Channel Outdoor · AutoNetTV Media · Regal Entertainment Group · Cedar Fair, LP · T-Rex Property, Ab · Prismview · Cinemark USA · Adaptive Micro Systems · Health Media Network · Carmike Cinemas · ECM Media · ANC Sports Enterprises · Blue Outdoor · Reach Sports Marketing Group · Disselkoen Properties · Outfront Media · RMG Networks · Fairway Outdoor Advertising
Courts
N.D. Ill. · E.D. Tex. · D. Minn. · S.D.N.Y. · W.D. Mich. · N.D. Tex.
Technology
business, commerce & admin data processing and displaying, advertising & signs · business, commerce & admin data processing and display control circuits
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:16-cv-06915 T-Rex Property, Ab v. Admirable, LLC N.D. Ill. 1 Jul 2016 193 d Voluntary dismissal
1:16-cv-06934 T-Rex Property, Ab v. Four Winds Interactive, LLC N.D. Ill. 1 Jul 2016 521 d Likely Settlement
1:16-cv-06938 T-Rex Property, Ab v. Barco, Inc. N.D. Ill. 1 Jul 2016 677 d Out-of-court Settlement
1:16-cv-06942 T-Rex Property, Ab v. Quality Systems Technology, Inc. N.D. Ill. 1 Jul 2016 124 d Other
6:16-cv-00974 T-Rex Property, Ab v. Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. E.D. Tex. 30 Jun 2016 1261 d Voluntary dismissal
1:16-cv-06649 T-Rex Property, Ab v. AutoNetTV Media, Inc. N.D. Ill. 24 Jun 2016 94 d Voluntary dismissal
6:16-cv-00927 T-Rex Property, Ab v. Regal Entertainment Group E.D. Tex. 24 Jun 2016 1267 d Voluntary dismissal
0:16-cv-02018 T-Rex Property, Ab v. Cedar Fair, LP D. Minn. 20 Jun 2016 561 d Likely Settlement
1:16-cv-04586 Broadsign International, LLC v. T-Rex Property, Ab S.D.N.Y. 16 Jun 2016 939 d Voluntary dismissal
4:16-cv-00404 T-Rex Property, Ab v. Prismview, LLC E.D. Tex. 16 Jun 2016 91 d Voluntary dismissal
4:16-cv-00393 T-Rex Property, Ab v. Cinemark USA, Inc. E.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2016 157 d Likely Settlement
1:16-cv-05667 T-Rex Property, Ab v. Adaptive Micro Systems, LLC N.D. Ill. 27 May 2016 550 d Likely Settlement
1:16-cv-05673 T-Rex Property, Ab v. Health Media Network, LLC N.D. Ill. 27 May 2016 109 d Voluntary dismissal
4:16-cv-00344 T-Rex Property, Ab v. Carmike Cinemas, Inc. E.D. Tex. 23 May 2016 207 d Likely Settlement
1:16-cv-05222 T-Rex Property, Ab v. ECM Media, LLC N.D. Ill. 13 May 2016 104 d Judgment on the Merits
0:16-cv-00581 T-Rex Property, Ab v. ANC Sports Enterprises, LLC D. Minn. 7 Mar 2016 86 d Likely Settlement
1:16-cv-00733 T-Rex Property, Ab v. Blue Outdoor, LLC S.D.N.Y. 1 Feb 2016 44 d Voluntary dismissal
0:16-cv-00070 T-Rex Property, Ab v. Reach Sports Marketing Group, Inc. D. Minn. 13 Jan 2016 61 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-00328 T-Rex Property, Ab v. Disselkoen Properties, Inc. W.D. Mich. 25 Mar 2015 65 d Likely Settlement
0:15-cv-01572 T-Rex Property, Ab v. Outfront Media, Inc. D. Minn. 23 Mar 2015 364 d Likely Settlement
3:15-cv-00738 T-Rex Property, Ab v. RMG Networks Holding Corporation N.D. Tex. 5 Mar 2015 223 d Likely Settlement
4:15-cv-00073 T-Rex Property, Ab v. Fairway Outdoor Advertising, LLC E.D. Tex. 30 Jan 2015 262 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US6430603B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

How strong is US6430603B2?

Closest prior art, compared claim by claim, with every reference rated for how hard it hits.

Run a novelty search
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.