US6711204B2 | Patent Litigation Record

11 cases on record

Cases on record: 11
Asserted by: Aperture Net
Asserted against: Franklin Wireless · Moxa Americas · Electric Mirror · General Dynamics Mission Systems · Raytheon Technologies · Watchguard Technologies · Casa Systems · Kyocera International · Razer USA · Lg Electronics U.S.A. · Sony Mobile Communications (U.S.A.)
Courts: S.D. Cal. · C.D. Cal. · W.D. Wash. · W.D. Tex. · D. Del.
Technology: transmission (general)

Case no.	Parties	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
3:22-cv-01885	Aperture Net, LLC v. Franklin Wireless Corp.	S.D. Cal.	29 Nov 2022	125 d	Consent Judgment
8:22-cv-02143	Aperture Net, LLC v. Moxa Americas, Inc.	C.D. Cal.	28 Nov 2022	109 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:22-cv-01548	Aperture Net, LLC v. Electric Mirror, Inc.	W.D. Wash.	1 Nov 2022	128 d	Consent Judgment
6:22-cv-01109	Aperture Net, LLC v. General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.	W.D. Tex.	25 Oct 2022	98 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:22-cv-01159	Aperture Net, LLC v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation	D. Del.	31 Aug 2022	209 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:20-cv-00816	Aperture Net, LLC v. Watchguard Technologies, Inc.	W.D. Wash.	30 May 2020	58 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:20-cv-00732	Aperture Net, LLC v. Casa Systems, Inc.	D. Del.	29 May 2020	46 d	Voluntary dismissal
3:19-cv-02091	Aperture Net, LLC v. Kyocera International, Inc.	S.D. Cal.	31 Oct 2019	81 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-02056	Aperture Net, LLC v. Razer USA, Ltd.	D. Del.	29 Oct 2019	146 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-01839	Aperture Net, LLC v. Lg Electronics U.S.A., Inc.	D. Del.	30 Sep 2019	231 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-01840	Aperture Net, LLC v. Sony Mobile Communications (U.S.A.), Inc.	D. Del.	30 Sep 2019	211 d	Voluntary dismissal

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US6711204B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

US6711204B2 Patent litigation record

11 cases on record

How strong is US6711204B2?