US7296121B2 | Patent Litigation Record

12 cases on record

Cases on record: 12
Asserted by: Memory Integrity
Asserted against: Sony · Amazon.com · Hisense International · Microsoft · ASUSTek Computer · Blackberry · HTC · Huawei Device USA · Motorola Solutions · Samsung Electronics · Toshiba
Courts: Fed. Cir. · D. Del.
Technology: electric digital data processing

Case no.	Parties	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
2016-2544	Memory Integrity, LLC v. Sony Corporation	Fed. Cir.	24 Aug 2016	138 d	Closed
2016-2426	Memory Integrity, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.	Fed. Cir.	4 Aug 2016	158 d	Closed
1:13-cv-01983	Memory Integrity, LLC v. Hisense International Co., Ltd	D. Del.	26 Nov 2013	1450 d	Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01984	Memory Integrity, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation	D. Del.	26 Nov 2013	1119 d	Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01797	Memory Integrity, LLC v. ASUSTek Computer, Inc.	D. Del.	1 Nov 2013	1396 d	Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01798	Memory Integrity, LLC v. Blackberry Limited	D. Del.	1 Nov 2013	1294 d	Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01802	Memory Integrity, LLC v. HTC Corporation	D. Del.	1 Nov 2013	1166 d	Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01803	Memory Integrity, LLC v. Huawei Device USA, Inc.	D. Del.	1 Nov 2013	1123 d	Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01807	Memory Integrity, LLC v. Motorola Solutions, Inc.	D. Del.	1 Nov 2013	1286 d	Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01808	Memory Integrity, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd.	D. Del.	1 Nov 2013	1166 d	Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01809	Memory Integrity, LLC v. Sony Corporation	D. Del.	1 Nov 2013	1166 d	Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01810	Memory Integrity, LLC v. Toshiba Corporation	D. Del.	1 Nov 2013	1321 d	Likely Settlement

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US7296121B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

US7296121B2 Patent litigation record

12 cases on record

How strong is US7296121B2?