US7323982B2 Patent litigation record

Patent 19 cases

US7323982B2 has been asserted in 19 cases on record. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

19 cases on record

Cases on record
19
Asserted by
WirelessWerx IP
Asserted against
HAPN · Spytec GPS · Tail Light · Audi of America · American Honda Motor · Blues · Ford Motor · Onstar · Subaru · Pointr USA · AT&T, Inc., d/b/a FirstNet · Nissan Motor · Voxx International · Mitsubishi Motors · Hyundai Motor America · Samsara · Life360
Courts
M.D. Fla. · S.D.N.Y. · N.D. Tex. · E.D. Mich. · C.D. Cal. · D. Mass. · E.D. Tex. · E.D.N.C. · N.D. Ga. · N.D. Cal.
Technology
signalling & alarm systems
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
8:25-cv-02703 WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. HAPN Holdings, LLC M.D. Fla. 3 Oct 2025 187 d Case Stayed
1:25-cv-04617 WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. Spytec GPS, Inc. S.D.N.Y. 2 Jun 2025 122 d Voluntary dismissal
3:25-cv-01026 WirelessWerx IP LLC v. Tail Light LLC N.D. Tex. 25 Apr 2025 132 d Voluntary dismissal
4:25-cv-11147 WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. Audi of America, LLC E.D. Mich. 21 Apr 2025 339 d Case Dismissed
2:25-cv-03471 WirelessWerx IP LLC v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. C.D. Cal. 18 Apr 2025 19 d Voluntary dismissal
1:25-cv-10469 WirelessWerx IP LLC v. Blues, Inc. D. Mass. 26 Feb 2025 104 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00241 WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. Ford Motor Co. E.D. Tex. 26 Feb 2025 50 d Voluntary dismissal
5:25-cv-00104 WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. Onstar, Corp. E.D.N.C. 25 Feb 2025 66 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00225 WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. Subaru, Corp. E.D. Tex. 21 Feb 2025 129 d Case Consolidated
1:25-cv-10391 WirelessWerx IP LLC v. Pointr USA Limited D. Mass. 15 Feb 2025 96 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00182 WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. AT&T, Inc., d/b/a FirstNet E.D. Tex. 14 Feb 2025 136 d Case Dismissed
3:25-cv-00382 WirelessWerx IP LLC v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. N.D. Tex. 14 Feb 2025 136 d Voluntary dismissal
6:25-cv-00330 WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. Voxx International, Corp. M.D. Fla. 14 Feb 2025 458 d Case Stayed
8:25-cv-00386 WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. Voxx International, Corp. M.D. Fla. 14 Feb 2025 13 d Case Transferred
3:25-cv-00340 WirelessWerx IP LLC v. Mitsubishi Motors Corporation N.D. Tex. 11 Feb 2025 64 d Voluntary dismissal
3:25-cv-00341 WirelessWerx IP LLC v. Hyundai Motor America Inc N.D. Tex. 11 Feb 2025 248 d Voluntary dismissal
3:25-cv-00342 WirelessWerx IP LLC v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. N.D. Tex. 11 Feb 2025 66 d Case Transferred
1:25-cv-00245 WirelessWerx IP LLC v. Samsara, Inc. N.D. Ga. 17 Jan 2025 71 d Voluntary dismissal
5:24-cv-08456 WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. Life360, Inc. N.D. Cal. 26 Nov 2024 125 d Voluntary dismissal
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US7323982B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

How strong is US7323982B2?

Closest prior art, compared claim by claim, with every reference rated for how hard it hits.

Run a novelty search
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information — including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing — use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.