US7599715B2 Patent litigation record

Patent 5 cases

US7599715B2 has been asserted in 5 cases on record. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

5 cases on record

Cases on record
5
Asserted by
Fleet Connect Solutions
Asserted against
Xirgo Technologies · GPS Insight · PowerFleet · Orkin · Flying Star Transport
Courts
E.D. Va. · D. Ariz. · E.D. Tex. · W.D. Tex.
Technology
transmission (general) and telephonic communication · business, commerce & admin data processing and telephonic communication · telephonic communication and transmission (general)
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:25-cv-01941 Fleet Connect Solutions, LLC v. Xirgo Technologies LLC E.D. Va. 3 Nov 2025 1 d Case Transferred
2:24-cv-02894 Fleet Connect Solutions, LLC v. GPS Insight Incorporated D. Ariz. 23 Oct 2024 329 d Case Dismissed
2:24-cv-00718 Fleet Connect Solutions, LLC v. PowerFleet, Inc. E.D. Tex. 30 Aug 2024 406 d Dismissed without Prejudice
2:24-cv-00157 Fleet Connect Solutions, LLC v. Orkin, LLC E.D. Tex. 6 Mar 2024 257 d Voluntary dismissal
6:21-cv-00988 Fleet Connect Solutions, LLC v. Flying Star Transport, LLC W.D. Tex. 24 Sep 2021 775 d Dismissed with Prejudice
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US7599715B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

How strong is US7599715B2?

Closest prior art, compared claim by claim, with every reference rated for how hard it hits.

Run a novelty search
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.