US7631191B2 Patent litigation record

Patent 17 cases

US7631191B2 has been asserted in 17 cases on record. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

17 cases on record

Cases on record
17
Asserted by
Authentixx
Asserted against
Bank of America · Nelnet · First Command Financial Services · Central National Bank · First State Bank · Texar Federal Credit Union · Lone Star Bank · Extraco Banks, National Association · First National Bank of Huntsville · First United Bank · The Bank & Trust · Jefferson Bank · UMB Financial · Blackhawk Bank · Merchants & Planters Bank · Community Bank
Courts
E.D. Tex. · W.D. Wis. · W.D. Tex. · S.D. Tex.
Technology
digital information transmission
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:24-cv-00287 Authentixx, LLC v. Bank of America Corp. E.D. Tex. 29 Apr 2024 3 d Voluntary dismissal
3:23-cv-00277 Authentixx, LLC v. Nelnet, Inc. W.D. Wis. 3 May 2023 56 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:23-cv-00273 Authentixx, LLC v. First Command Financial Services, Inc. W.D. Tex. 13 Apr 2023 117 d Dismissed without Prejudice
6:23-cv-00274 Authentixx, LLC v. Central National Bank W.D. Tex. 13 Apr 2023 131 d Case Dismissed
2:23-cv-00153 Authentixx, LLC v. First State Bank E.D. Tex. 5 Apr 2023 98 d Case Dismissed
2:23-cv-00154 Authentixx, LLC v. Texar Federal Credit Union E.D. Tex. 5 Apr 2023 98 d Dismissed without Prejudice
4:23-cv-01275 Authentixx, LLC v. Lone Star Bank S.D. Tex. 5 Apr 2023 96 d Case Dismissed
6:23-cv-00235 Authentixx, LLC v. Extraco Banks, National Association W.D. Tex. 3 Apr 2023 101 d Dismissed without Prejudice
6:23-cv-00236 Authentixx, LLC v. First National Bank of Huntsville W.D. Tex. 3 Apr 2023 101 d Dismissed without Prejudice
6:23-cv-00237 Authentixx, LLC v. First United Bank W.D. Tex. 3 Apr 2023 101 d Case Dismissed
6:23-cv-00238 Authentixx, LLC v. The Bank & Trust W.D. Tex. 3 Apr 2023 101 d Dismissed without Prejudice
6:23-cv-00246 Authentixx, LLC v. Jefferson Bank W.D. Tex. 3 Apr 2023 42 d Voluntary dismissal
2:23-cv-00056 Authentixx, LLC v. Nelnet, Inc. E.D. Tex. 15 Feb 2023 77 d Case Transferred
2:23-cv-00057 Authentixx, LLC v. UMB Financial, Corp. E.D. Tex. 15 Feb 2023 65 d Case Dismissed
3:23-cv-00108 Authentixx, LLC v. Blackhawk Bank W.D. Wis. 15 Feb 2023 145 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:23-cv-00121 Authentixx, LLC v. Merchants & Planters Bank W.D. Tex. 15 Feb 2023 14 d Voluntary dismissal
6:23-cv-00122 Authentixx, LLC v. Community Bank W.D. Tex. 15 Feb 2023 20 d Voluntary dismissal
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US7631191B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

How strong is US7631191B2?

Closest prior art, compared claim by claim, with every reference rated for how hard it hits.

Run a novelty search
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.