US7945544B2 Patent litigation record

Patent 22 cases

US7945544B2 has been asserted in 22 cases on record. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

22 cases on record

Cases on record
22
Asserted by
In re: Personalweb Technologies · PersonalWeb Technologies · Personal Web Technologies
Asserted against
Amazon.com · Level 3 Communications · Cars.com · Treehouse Island · Brooklyn Brewery · Wework Companies · Dollar Shave Club · Match Group · Lesson Nine · Hootsuite Media · Group Nine Media · Spongecell · Atlas Obscura · BDG Media · Centaur Media USA · Fab Commerce & Design · Popsugar · Smugmug · Rackspace US · Apple
Courts
Fed. Cir. · D. Del. · E.D.N.Y. · S.D.N.Y. · C.D. Cal. · N.D. Cal. · E.D. Tex.
Technology
electric digital data processing and digital information transmission · electric digital data processing
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
21-1858 In re: Personalweb Technologies, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. Fed. Cir. 16 Apr 2021 931 d Appeal Dismissed
21-1859 PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. Fed. Cir. 16 Apr 2021 931 d Appeal Dismissed
21-1860 PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Level 3 Communications, Inc. Fed. Cir. 16 Apr 2021 931 d Appeal Dismissed
1:18-cv-01140 Personal Web Technologies, LLC v. Cars.com, LLC D. Del. 1 Aug 2018 22 d MDL Transfer
1:18-cv-01148 Personal Web Technologies, LLC v. Treehouse Island, Inc. D. Del. 1 Aug 2018 22 d MDL Transfer
1:18-cv-04364 PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Brooklyn Brewery, Corp. E.D.N.Y. 1 Aug 2018 34 d MDL Transfer
1:18-cv-06932 PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Wework Companies, Inc. S.D.N.Y. 1 Aug 2018 27 d MDL Transfer
2:18-cv-06596 PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Dollar Shave Club, Inc. C.D. Cal. 31 Jul 2018 29 d MDL Transfer
5:18-cv-03457 PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Level 3 Communications, LLC N.D. Cal. 11 Jun 2018 200 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-00136 Personal Web Technologies, LLC v. Match Group, LLC D. Del. 24 Jan 2018 133 d MDL Transfer
4:18-cv-00046 PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Lesson Nine, GmbH E.D. Tex. 17 Jan 2018 146 d MDL Transfer
4:18-cv-00048 PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Hootsuite Media, Inc. E.D. Tex. 17 Jan 2018 55 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-00268 PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Group Nine Media, Inc. S.D.N.Y. 11 Jan 2018 154 d MDL Transfer
1:18-cv-00272 PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Spongecell, Inc. S.D.N.Y. 11 Jan 2018 154 d MDL Transfer
1:18-cv-00164 PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Atlas Obscura, Inc. E.D.N.Y. 10 Jan 2018 173 d MDL Transfer
1:18-cv-00212 PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. BDG Media, Inc. S.D.N.Y. 10 Jan 2018 155 d MDL Transfer
1:18-cv-00219 PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Centaur Media USA, Inc. S.D.N.Y. 10 Jan 2018 155 d MDL Transfer
1:18-cv-00220 PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Fab Commerce & Design, Inc. S.D.N.Y. 10 Jan 2018 155 d MDL Transfer
5:18-cv-00168 PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Popsugar, Inc. N.D. Cal. 8 Jan 2018 91 d Voluntary dismissal
5:18-cv-00172 PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Smugmug, Inc. N.D. Cal. 8 Jan 2018 9 d Voluntary dismissal
5:16-cv-01267 PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Rackspace US, Inc. N.D. Cal. 15 Mar 2016 336 d Likely Settlement
5:14-cv-01683 PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Apple, Inc. N.D. Cal. 11 Apr 2014 847 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US7945544B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

How strong is US7945544B2?

Closest prior art, compared claim by claim, with every reference rated for how hard it hits.

Run a novelty search
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.