US8146077B2 Patent litigation record

Patent 33 cases

US8146077B2 has been asserted in 33 cases on record. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Analyse this patent in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

33 cases on record

Cases on record
33
Asserted by
Ameranth
Asserted against
Domino's Pizza · Hotels.com, LP · Hilton Worldwide · Kayak Software · Mobo Systems · Orbitz · Stubhub · Ticketmaster · Travelocity.com · Usablenet · Fandango Media · Hotwire · Expedia · Oracle · ATX Innovation · Apple · Eventbrite · Ticketbiscuit · Ticketfly · Starbucks · Papa Johns USA · Opentable · Seamless North America · Grubhub · Agilysys · Hyatt · Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide · Best Western International · Marriott International · Hotel Tonight · Pizza Hut
Courts
Fed. Cir. · S.D. Cal.
Technology
electric digital data processing · electric digital data processing and switching & selecting
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
22-2223 Ameranth, Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc. Fed. Cir. 20 Sep 2022 357 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1671 Ameranth, Inc. v. Hotels.com, LP Fed. Cir. 18 Apr 2022 512 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1672 Ameranth, Inc. v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc. Fed. Cir. 18 Apr 2022 512 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1673 Ameranth, Inc. v. Kayak Software, Corp. Fed. Cir. 18 Apr 2022 512 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1674 Ameranth, Inc. v. Mobo Systems, Inc. Fed. Cir. 18 Apr 2022 512 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1675 Ameranth, Inc. v. Orbitz, Inc. Fed. Cir. 18 Apr 2022 512 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1676 Ameranth, Inc. v. Stubhub, Inc. Fed. Cir. 18 Apr 2022 512 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1677 Ameranth, Inc. v. Ticketmaster, Inc. Fed. Cir. 18 Apr 2022 512 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1678 Ameranth, Inc. v. Travelocity.com, Inc. Fed. Cir. 18 Apr 2022 512 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1679 Ameranth, Inc. v. Usablenet Fed. Cir. 18 Apr 2022 512 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1680 Ameranth, Inc. v. Fandango Media, LLC Fed. Cir. 18 Apr 2022 512 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1681 Ameranth, Inc. v. Hotwire, Inc. Fed. Cir. 18 Apr 2022 512 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1682 Ameranth, Inc. v. Expedia, Inc. Fed. Cir. 18 Apr 2022 512 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1683 Ameranth, Inc. v. Oracle Fed. Cir. 18 Apr 2022 512 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1684 Ameranth, Inc. v. ATX Innovation, Inc. Fed. Cir. 18 Apr 2022 512 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1686 Ameranth, Inc. v. Apple, Inc. Fed. Cir. 18 Apr 2022 512 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1687 Ameranth, Inc. v. Eventbrite, Inc. Fed. Cir. 18 Apr 2022 512 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1689 Ameranth, Inc. v. Ticketbiscuit, LLC Fed. Cir. 18 Apr 2022 512 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1690 Ameranth, Inc. v. Ticketfly, Inc. Fed. Cir. 18 Apr 2022 512 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1692 Ameranth, Inc. v. Starbucks Corporation Fed. Cir. 18 Apr 2022 512 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1655 Ameranth, Inc. v. Papa Johns USA, Inc. Fed. Cir. 15 Apr 2022 515 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1657 Ameranth, Inc. v. Opentable, Inc. Fed. Cir. 15 Apr 2022 515 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1660 Ameranth, Inc. v. Seamless North America Fed. Cir. 15 Apr 2022 515 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1661 Ameranth, Inc. v. Grubhub, Inc. Fed. Cir. 15 Apr 2022 515 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1662 Ameranth, Inc. v. Agilysys, Inc. Fed. Cir. 15 Apr 2022 515 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1663 Ameranth, Inc. v. Hyatt, Corp. Fed. Cir. 15 Apr 2022 515 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1666 Ameranth, Inc. v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. Fed. Cir. 15 Apr 2022 515 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1667 Ameranth, Inc. v. Best Western International, Inc. Fed. Cir. 15 Apr 2022 515 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1668 Ameranth, Inc. v. Marriott International, Inc. Fed. Cir. 15 Apr 2022 515 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1669 Ameranth, Inc. v. Hotel Tonight, Inc. Fed. Cir. 15 Apr 2022 515 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1200 Ameranth, Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc. Fed. Cir. 30 Nov 2021 651 d Appeal Dismissed
2019-1144 Ameranth, Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, LLC Fed. Cir. 1 Nov 2018 365 d Closed
3:11-cv-01810 Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc. S.D. Cal. 15 Aug 2011 3125 d Stayed
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US8146077B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

How strong is US8146077B2?

Closest prior art, compared claim by claim, with every reference rated for how hard it hits.

Run a novelty search
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.