US8199747B2 | Patent Litigation Record

12 cases on record

Cases on record: 12
Asserted by: Uniloc 2017 · Uniloc USA · Uniloc
Asserted against: Samsung Electronics America · Hike · Huawei Device USA · Vonage · AOL · Green Tomato · Tencent America · Snap · Kakao · Viber Media, SARL · Voxernet
Courts: Fed. Cir. · E.D. Tex.
Technology: digital information transmission

Case no.	Parties	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
2019-2168	Uniloc 2017, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.	Fed. Cir.	23 Jul 2019	219 d	Closed
2:17-cv-00476	Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Hike, Ltd.	E.D. Tex.	6 Jun 2017	681 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:17-cv-00349	Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Hike, Ltd.	E.D. Tex.	21 Apr 2017	721 d	Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00994	Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Huawei Device USA, Inc.	E.D. Tex.	6 Sep 2016	1030 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00893	Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Vonage Holdings, Corp.	E.D. Tex.	11 Aug 2016	98 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00722	Uniloc USA, Inc. v. AOL, Inc.	E.D. Tex.	5 Jul 2016	398 d	Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00731	Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Green Tomato Limited	E.D. Tex.	5 Jul 2016	1017 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00694	Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Tencent America, LLC	E.D. Tex.	30 Jun 2016	354 d	Out-of-court Settlement
2:16-cv-00696	Uniloc, Corp. v. Snap, Inc.	E.D. Tex.	30 Jun 2016	2568 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
2:16-cv-00640	Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Kakao Corporation	E.D. Tex.	14 Jun 2016	276 d	Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00643	Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Viber Media, SARL	E.D. Tex.	14 Jun 2016	219 d	Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00644	Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Voxernet, LLC	E.D. Tex.	14 Jun 2016	197 d	Likely Settlement

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US8199747B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

US8199747B2 Patent litigation record

12 cases on record

How strong is US8199747B2?