US8285648B2 | Patent Litigation Record

10 cases on record

Cases on record: 10
Asserted by: Verify Smart
Asserted against: First Republic Bank · Discover Financial Services · Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. · Valley National Bancorp · JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. · Twitter · Salesforce.com · Dropbox · Yahoo! · Bank of America
Courts: S.D.N.Y. · D.N.J. · E.D. Tex.
Technology: business, commerce & admin data processing

Case no.	Parties	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
1:16-cv-09078	Verify Smart, Corp. v. First Republic Bank	S.D.N.Y.	22 Nov 2016	148 d	Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-08647	Verify Smart, Corp. v. Discover Financial Services, Inc.	D.N.J.	21 Nov 2016	123 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-06389	Verify Smart, Corp. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.	D.N.J.	4 Oct 2016	57 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-06065	Verify Smart, Corp. v. Valley National Bancorp	D.N.J.	28 Sep 2016	177 d	Out-of-court Settlement
2:16-cv-04853	Verify Smart, Corp. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.	D.N.J.	9 Aug 2016	3 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00235	Verify Smart, Corp. v. Twitter, Inc.	E.D. Tex.	17 Mar 2016	102 d	Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00237	Verify Smart, Corp. v. Salesforce.com, Inc.	E.D. Tex.	17 Mar 2016	102 d	Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00238	Verify Smart, Corp. v. Dropbox, Inc.	E.D. Tex.	17 Mar 2016	102 d	Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-07965	Verify Smart, Corp. v. Yahoo! Inc.	D.N.J.	7 Nov 2015	130 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:14-cv-05117	Verify Smart, Corp. v. Bank of America Corporation	D.N.J.	14 Aug 2014	320 d	Likely Settlement

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US8285648B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

US8285648B2 Patent litigation record

10 cases on record

How strong is US8285648B2?