US8329680B2 | Patent Litigation Record

12 cases on record

Cases on record: 12
Asserted by: Astrazeneca AB · Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP
Asserted against: Accord Healthcare · Apotex · Fresenius Kabi USA · HBT Labs · Teva Pharmaceuticals USA · Amneal Pharmaceuticals · Mylan Institutional · InnoPharma Licensing · Mylan Pharmaceuticals · Sagent Pharmaceuticals · Sandoz
Courts: M.D.N.C. · D.N.J. · D. Del.
Technology: medicinal preparations

Case no.	Parties	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
1:18-cv-00731	Astrazeneca AB v. Accord Healthcare, Inc.	M.D.N.C.	24 Aug 2018	89 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-11238	Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP v. Apotex, Inc.	D.N.J.	29 Jun 2018	49 d	Other
1:17-cv-13075	Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC	D.N.J.	14 Dec 2017	50 d	Out-of-court Settlement
1:17-cv-02652	Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP v. HBT Labs, Inc.	D.N.J.	18 Apr 2017	146 d	Other
1:17-cv-02448	Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.	D.N.J.	10 Apr 2017	294 d	Other
1:17-cv-01968	Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC	D.N.J.	24 Mar 2017	364 d	Other
1:16-cv-00669	Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP v. Mylan Institutional, LLC	D. Del.	5 Aug 2016	91 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:16-cv-04612	Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP v. Mylan Institutional, LLC	D.N.J.	29 Jul 2016	164 d	Other
1:16-cv-01962	Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP v. InnoPharma Licensing, LLC	D.N.J.	7 Apr 2016	33 d	Other
1:15-cv-07009	Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	D.N.J.	21 Sep 2015	78 d	Procedural Outcome
1:14-cv-05539	Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP v. Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	D.N.J.	2 Sep 2014	247 d	Other
1:14-cv-03547	Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP v. Sandoz, Inc.	D.N.J.	3 Jun 2014	790 d	Out-of-court Settlement

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US8329680B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

US8329680B2 Patent litigation record

12 cases on record

How strong is US8329680B2?