US8700749B2 Patent litigation record

Patent 16 cases

US8700749B2 has been asserted in 16 cases on record. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

16 cases on record

Cases on record
16
Asserted by
F2VS Technologies · Endeavor MeshTech
Asserted against
Datto · Emerson Electric · Vigilent · McQ · Digi International · Daintree Networks · Acuity Brands Lighting · Aruba Networks · Qualcomm Technologies · Ruckus Wireless · Ericsson · Strix Systems · Freewave Technologies · Synapse Wireless · Mueller Systems · Energyhub
Courts
D. Del. · E.D. Mo. · E.D. Va. · D. Minn. · N.D. Ga. · S.D.N.Y. · D. Colo. · N.D. Ala.
Technology
electric digital data processing
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:20-cv-00314 F2VS Technologies, LLC v. Datto, Inc. D. Del. 2 Mar 2020 151 d Voluntary dismissal
4:20-cv-00341 F2VS Technologies, LLC v. Emerson Electric, Co. E.D. Mo. 2 Mar 2020 21 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-01137 F2VS Technologies, LLC v. Vigilent Corporation D. Del. 19 Jun 2019 176 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-01571 F2VS Technologies, LLC v. McQ, Inc. E.D. Va. 20 Dec 2018 169 d Voluntary dismissal
0:18-cv-02242 F2VS Technologies, LLC v. Digi International, Inc. D. Minn. 31 Jul 2018 121 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-01713 F2VS Technologies, LLC v. Daintree Networks, Inc. D. Del. 28 Nov 2017 220 d Likely Settlement
1:17-cv-04774 F2VS Technologies, LLC v. Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. N.D. Ga. 28 Nov 2017 216 d Likely Settlement
1:17-cv-00754 F2VS Technologies, LLC v. Aruba Networks, Inc. D. Del. 13 Jun 2017 360 d Likely Settlement
1:17-cv-00755 F2VS Technologies, LLC v. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. D. Del. 13 Jun 2017 183 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-00756 F2VS Technologies, LLC v. Ruckus Wireless, Inc. D. Del. 13 Jun 2017 492 d Likely Settlement
1:16-cv-02165 Endeavor MeshTech, Inc v. Ericsson, Inc S.D.N.Y. 24 Mar 2016 341 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-09251 Endeavor MeshTech, Inc v. Strix Systems, Inc. S.D.N.Y. 23 Nov 2015 1249 d Case Dismissed
1:15-cv-01276 Endeavor MeshTech, Inc v. Freewave Technologies, Inc. D. Colo. 16 Jun 2015 162 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00489 Endeavor MeshTech, Inc v. Synapse Wireless, Inc. N.D. Ala. 25 Mar 2015 70 d Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-01361 Endeavor MeshTech, Inc v. Mueller Systems, LLC D. Del. 31 Oct 2014 217 d Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-08198 Endeavor MeshTech, Inc v. Energyhub, Inc. S.D.N.Y. 14 Oct 2014 80 d Voluntary dismissal
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US8700749B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

How strong is US8700749B2?

Closest prior art, compared claim by claim, with every reference rated for how hard it hits.

Run a novelty search
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.