US8732347B2 | Patent Litigation Record

12 cases on record

Cases on record: 12
Asserted by: Azure Networks
Asserted against: Vizio · Marvell Semiconductor · CSR · Dell · Samsung TeleCommunications America · HTC · Matsushita Electric Industrial · Toshiba America Information Systems · ZTE · Intel · Texas Instruments
Courts: E.D. Tex.
Technology: digital information transmission

Case no.	Parties	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
6:15-cv-00048	Azure Networks, LLC v. Vizio, Inc.	E.D. Tex.	15 Jan 2015	223 d	Out-of-court Settlement
6:15-cv-00035	Azure Networks, LLC v. Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.	E.D. Tex.	13 Jan 2015	356 d	Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00036	Azure Networks, LLC v. CSR plc	E.D. Tex.	13 Jan 2015	232 d	Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00040	Azure Networks, LLC v. Dell, Inc.	E.D. Tex.	13 Jan 2015	225 d	Out-of-court Settlement
6:15-cv-00019	Azure Networks, LLC v. Samsung TeleCommunications America, LLC	E.D. Tex.	12 Jan 2015	224 d	Out-of-court Settlement
6:15-cv-00022	Azure Networks, LLC v. Dell, Inc.	E.D. Tex.	12 Jan 2015	1 d	Other
6:15-cv-00024	Azure Networks, LLC v. HTC Corporation	E.D. Tex.	12 Jan 2015	221 d	Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00026	Azure Networks, LLC v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.	E.D. Tex.	12 Jan 2015	233 d	Out-of-court Settlement
6:15-cv-00028	Azure Networks, LLC v. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.	E.D. Tex.	12 Jan 2015	652 d	Out-of-court Settlement
6:15-cv-00029	Azure Networks, LLC v. ZTE Corporation	E.D. Tex.	12 Jan 2015	233 d	Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00031	Azure Networks, LLC v. Intel Corporation	E.D. Tex.	12 Jan 2015	221 d	Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00032	Azure Networks, LLC v. Texas Instruments, Inc.	E.D. Tex.	12 Jan 2015	332 d	Likely Settlement

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US8732347B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

US8732347B2 Patent litigation record

12 cases on record

How strong is US8732347B2?