US8733657B2 Patent litigation record

Patent 21 cases

US8733657B2 has been asserted in 21 cases on record. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Analyse this patent in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

21 cases on record

Cases on record
21
Asserted by
Reflection Code
Asserted against
Carter`s · The Hershey · MUCCI FARMS · DJI Technology · The Wendy's · Farouk Systems · Char-Broil · Electrolux Home Care Products · First Act · Diversified Dynamics · Mattel · Whirlpool · Michaels Stores · General Mills · Nestle Purina Petcare · Gerber Products · Land O'Lakes · 1-800 Flowers.com · Kohler · L'Oreal USA · CVS Pharmacy
Courts
N.D. Ill. · E.D. Mich. · E.D. Tex.
Technology
data recognition & presentation
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:20-cv-00466 Reflection Code, LLC v. Carter`s, Inc. N.D. Ill. 21 Jan 2020 162 d Voluntary dismissal
1:20-cv-00470 Reflection Code, LLC v. The Hershey Company N.D. Ill. 21 Jan 2020 143 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-11107 Reflection Code, LLC v. MUCCI FARMS, Ltd. E.D. Mich. 6 Apr 2018 144 d Voluntary dismissal
2:17-cv-10067 Reflection Code, LLC v. DJI Technology, Inc. E.D. Mich. 10 Jan 2017 171 d Voluntary dismissal
2:17-cv-10056 Reflection Code, LLC v. The Wendy's Company E.D. Mich. 9 Jan 2017 213 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-12993 Reflection Code, LLC v. Farouk Systems, Inc. E.D. Mich. 17 Aug 2016 337 d Other
2:16-cv-12976 Reflection Code, LLC v. Char-Broil, LLC E.D. Mich. 16 Aug 2016 114 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-12985 Reflection Code, LLC v. Electrolux Home Care Products, Inc. E.D. Mich. 16 Aug 2016 437 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-12988 Reflection Code, LLC v. First Act, Inc. E.D. Mich. 16 Aug 2016 59 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-12967 Reflection Code, LLC v. Diversified Dynamics Corporation E.D. Mich. 15 Aug 2016 58 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-01932 Reflection Code, LLC v. Mattel, Inc. E.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2015 122 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01934 Reflection Code, LLC v. Whirlpool Corporation E.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2015 105 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01663 Reflection Code, LLC v. Michaels Stores, Inc. E.D. Tex. 20 Oct 2015 279 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01664 Reflection Code, LLC v. General Mills, Inc. E.D. Tex. 20 Oct 2015 168 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01666 Reflection Code, LLC v. Nestle Purina Petcare Company E.D. Tex. 20 Oct 2015 129 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01667 Reflection Code, LLC v. Gerber Products Company E.D. Tex. 20 Oct 2015 126 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01668 Reflection Code, LLC v. Land O'Lakes, Inc. E.D. Tex. 20 Oct 2015 318 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01512 Reflection Code, LLC v. 1-800 Flowers.com, Inc. E.D. Tex. 11 Sep 2015 357 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01518 Reflection Code, LLC v. Kohler E.D. Tex. 11 Sep 2015 248 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01519 Reflection Code, LLC v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. E.D. Tex. 11 Sep 2015 90 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01521 Reflection Code, LLC v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc E.D. Tex. 11 Sep 2015 194 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US8733657B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

How strong is US8733657B2?

Closest prior art, compared claim by claim, with every reference rated for how hard it hits.

Run a novelty search
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.