US9503470B2 | Patent Litigation Record

12 cases on record

Cases on record: 12
Asserted by: Ctd Networks · CTD Networks
Asserted against: Google · Microsoft · Musarubra US · Verizon Communications · Akamai Technologies · Palo Alto Networks · International Business Machines · AT&T · Cisco Networks
Courts: Fed. Cir. · E.D. Tex. · W.D. Tex.
Technology: digital information transmission and electric digital data processing

Case no.	Parties	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
23-2428	Ctd Networks, LLC v. Google, LLC	Fed. Cir.	27 Sep 2023	240 d	Appeal Dismissed
23-2429	Ctd Networks, LLC v. Microsoft, Co.	Fed. Cir.	27 Sep 2023	240 d	Case Withdrawn
2:23-cv-00273	CTD Networks, LLC v. Musarubra US, LLC	E.D. Tex.	12 Jun 2023	176 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
6:22-cv-01306	CTD Networks LLC v. Verizon Communications, Inc.	W.D. Tex.	28 Dec 2022	257 d	Voluntary dismissal
6:22-cv-01302	CTD Networks LLC v. Akamai Technologies, Inc.	W.D. Tex.	27 Dec 2022	108 d	Voluntary dismissal
6:22-cv-01303	CTD Networks LLC v. Musarubra US, LLC	W.D. Tex.	27 Dec 2022	167 d	Voluntary dismissal
6:22-cv-01304	CTD Networks, LLC v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.	W.D. Tex.	27 Dec 2022	87 d	Voluntary dismissal
6:22-cv-01042	CTD Networks, LLC v. Google, LLC	W.D. Tex.	6 Oct 2022	320 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
6:22-cv-01044	CTD Networks, LLC v. International Business Machines, Corp.	W.D. Tex.	6 Oct 2022	196 d	Consent Judgment
6:22-cv-01049	CTD Networks, LLC v. Microsoft, Co.	W.D. Tex.	6 Oct 2022	320 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
6:22-cv-01038	CTD Networks, LLC v. AT&T, Inc.	W.D. Tex.	5 Oct 2022	121 d	Voluntary dismissal
6:22-cv-01039	CTD Networks, LLC v. Cisco Networks, Inc.	W.D. Tex.	5 Oct 2022	315 d	Dismissed with Prejudice

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US9503470B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

US9503470B2 Patent litigation record

12 cases on record

How strong is US9503470B2?