19 cases on record
- Cases on record
- 19
- Asserted by
- Ortiz & Associates Consulting
- Asserted against
- SITA Information Networking Computing USA · IKEA US Retail · McDonald's USA · Macy's · Kroger · Staples · Nike · Costco Wholesale · Diebold Nixdorf · Sharp Imaging and Information Company of America · ScreenBeam · FedEx · Brother Mobile Solutions · Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA · Epson America · Vizio · Actiontec Electronics · Ricoh
- Courts
- N.D. Tex. · E.D. Tex. · W.D. Tex. · N.D. Ohio · N.D. Cal. · D. Colo.
- Technology
- wireless communication networks
| Case no. | Parties | Court | Filed | Duration | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3:25-cv-03070 | Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. SITA Information Networking Computing USA, Inc. | N.D. Tex. | 11 Nov 2025 | 190 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:25-cv-00523 | Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. IKEA US Retail, LLC | E.D. Tex. | 13 May 2025 | 168 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:25-cv-00457 | Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. McDonald's USA, LLC | E.D. Tex. | 1 May 2025 | 413 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 7:25-cv-00033 | Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Macy's, Inc. | W.D. Tex. | 29 Jan 2025 | 428 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 7:25-cv-00034 | Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Kroger, Co. | W.D. Tex. | 29 Jan 2025 | 190 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 7:25-cv-00030 | Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Staples, Inc. | W.D. Tex. | 28 Jan 2025 | 134 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 7:25-cv-00031 | Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Nike | W.D. Tex. | 28 Jan 2025 | 177 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 7:25-cv-00032 | Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Costco Wholesale, Corp. | W.D. Tex. | 28 Jan 2025 | 251 d | Case Dismissed |
| 2:25-cv-00074 | Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. IKEA US Retail, LLC | E.D. Tex. | 24 Jan 2025 | 111 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 5:24-cv-02096 | Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. | N.D. Ohio | 2 Dec 2024 | 137 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 7:24-cv-00274 | Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Sharp Imaging and Information Company of America | W.D. Tex. | 31 Oct 2024 | 181 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:24-cv-06394 | Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. ScreenBeam, Inc. | N.D. Cal. | 11 Sep 2024 | 152 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:24-cv-00736 | Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. FedEx Corporation | E.D. Tex. | 9 Sep 2024 | 331 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:24-cv-01198 | Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Brother Mobile Solutions, Inc. | D. Colo. | 1 May 2024 | 7 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 6:23-cv-00471 | Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA, Inc. | W.D. Tex. | 27 Jun 2023 | 363 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:23-cv-00308 | Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Epson America, Inc. | E.D. Tex. | 26 Jun 2023 | 102 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:23-cv-00791 | Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Vizio, Inc. | N.D. Tex. | 14 Apr 2023 | 201 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 6:23-cv-00139 | Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Actiontec Electronics, Inc. | W.D. Tex. | 22 Feb 2023 | 13 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 6:21-cv-01178 | Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Ricoh Company, Ltd. | W.D. Tex. | 12 Nov 2021 | 515 d | Case Dismissed |
How strong is US9549285B2?
Closest prior art, compared claim by claim, with every reference rated for how hard it hits.
Run a novelty search- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.
Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.
Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.
Report an incorrect record
Tell us what is wrong on this page. The page address is included automatically.
Privacy request
For requests about your personal information on this page. The page address is included automatically.