US9749847B2 | Patent Litigation Record

14 cases on record

Cases on record: 14
Asserted by: Cellspin Soft
Asserted against: Nike · Fitbit · Garmin · Under Armour · Fossil Group · Nikon · Garmin International · TomTom
Courts: N.D. Cal. · Fed. Cir. · E.D. Tex.
Technology: wireless communication networks and digital information transmission · wireless communication networks · wireless communication networks and electric digital data processing

Case no.	Parties	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
4:23-cv-05340	Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Nike	N.D. Cal.	19 Oct 2023	586 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
23-1526	Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit, LLC	Fed. Cir.	22 Feb 2023	618 d	Appeal Dismissed in Part
2:22-cv-00455	Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Nike	E.D. Tex.	23 Nov 2022	335 d	Case Transferred
22-2037	Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Garmin, Ltd.	Fed. Cir.	19 Jul 2022	836 d	Appeal Dismissed
22-2028	Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Nike	Fed. Cir.	18 Jul 2022	837 d	Appeal Dismissed
22-2029	Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Under Armour, Inc.	Fed. Cir.	18 Jul 2022	837 d	Appeal Dismissed
22-2030	Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fossil Group, Inc	Fed. Cir.	18 Jul 2022	837 d	Appeal Dismissed
22-2032	Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Nikon Corporation	Fed. Cir.	18 Jul 2022	837 d	Appeal Dismissed
22-2025	Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit, LLC	Fed. Cir.	15 Jul 2022	840 d	Appeal Dismissed
2018-2178	Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc.	Fed. Cir.	23 Jul 2018	337 d	Closed
2018-2180	Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.	Fed. Cir.	23 Jul 2018	337 d	Closed
2018-1820	Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.	Fed. Cir.	13 Apr 2018	438 d	Closed
2018-1822	Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Garmin International, Inc.	Fed. Cir.	13 Apr 2018	438 d	Closed
4:17-cv-05937	Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. TomTom, Inc.	N.D. Cal.	16 Oct 2017	101 d	Voluntary dismissal

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US9749847B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

US9749847B2 Patent litigation record

14 cases on record

How strong is US9749847B2?