US9769477B2 Patent litigation record

Patent 15 cases

US9769477B2 has been asserted in 15 cases on record. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Analyse this patent in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

15 cases on record

Cases on record
15
Asserted by
Realtime Adaptive Streaming
Asserted against
Sling TV · Netflix · Haivision Network Video · Charter Communications · Cox Communications · Advanced Micro Devices · Intel · LG Electronics · Wowza Media Systems · Adobe Systems · Apple · Sony Electronics · Cisco Systems · Amazon.com
Courts
Fed. Cir. · C.D. Cal. · W.D. Tex. · D. Colo. · E.D. Tex. · D. Mass. · D. Del.
Technology
pictorial communication (video/tv)
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
21-2268 Realtime Adaptive Streaming, LLC v. Sling TV, LLC Fed. Cir. 31 Aug 2021 618 d Appeal Dismissed
2:19-cv-06361 Realtime Adaptive Streaming, LLC v. Netflix, Inc. C.D. Cal. 23 Jul 2019 114 d Voluntary dismissal
6:19-cv-00441 Realtime Adaptive Streaming, LLC v. Haivision Network Video, Inc. W.D. Tex. 23 Jul 2019 140 d Likely Settlement
1:18-cv-01345 Realtime Adaptive Streaming, LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc. D. Colo. 1 Jun 2018 126 d Voluntary dismissal
8:18-cv-00942 Realtime Adaptive Streaming, LLC v. Cox Communications, Inc. C.D. Cal. 31 May 2018 117 d Out-of-court Settlement
1:18-cv-01173 Realtime Adaptive Streaming, LLC v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. D. Colo. 15 May 2018 141 d Likely Settlement
1:18-cv-01175 Realtime Adaptive Streaming, LLC v. Intel Corporation D. Colo. 15 May 2018 139 d Out-of-court Settlement
6:18-cv-00215 Realtime Adaptive Streaming, LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc. E.D. Tex. 15 May 2018 134 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-00927 Realtime Adaptive Streaming, LLC v. Wowza Media Systems, LLC D. Colo. 20 Apr 2018 164 d Out-of-court Settlement
1:18-cv-10355 Realtime Adaptive Streaming, LLC v. Adobe Systems, Inc. D. Mass. 23 Feb 2018 101 d Case Transferred
1:17-cv-02869 Realtime Adaptive Streaming, LLC v. Apple, Inc. D. Colo. 30 Nov 2017 316 d Out-of-court Settlement
1:17-cv-01692 Realtime Adaptive Streaming, LLC v. Netflix, Inc. D. Del. 21 Nov 2017 608 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-01693 Realtime Adaptive Streaming, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. D. Del. 21 Nov 2017 349 d Likely Settlement
6:17-cv-00591 Realtime Adaptive Streaming, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. E.D. Tex. 18 Oct 2017 341 d Likely Settlement
6:17-cv-00549 Realtime Adaptive Streaming, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. E.D. Tex. 27 Sep 2017 464 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US9769477B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

How strong is US9769477B2?

Closest prior art, compared claim by claim, with every reference rated for how hard it hits.

Run a novelty search
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.