US9841728B2 Patent litigation record

Patent 21 cases

US9841728B2 has been asserted in 21 cases on record. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Analyse this patent in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

21 cases on record

Cases on record
21
Asserted by
Canon · Canon U.S.A.
Asserted against
International Trade Commission · Do It Wiser · Apex Excel · Bluedog Distribution · FTrade · GPC Trading · 9010-8077 Quebec · World Class Ink Supply · Print After Print · Ninestar Technology · Ourway US · Frontier Imaging · LD Products · Linkyo · Billiontree Technology USA · Ink Technologies Printer Supplies · Master Print Supplies · Zinyaw · ACM Technologies · The Supplies Guys
Courts
Fed. Cir. · D. Del. · United States International Trade Commission · S.D. Fla. · N.D. Ga. · E.D.N.Y. · D.N.J. · D. Ariz. · C.D. Cal. · S.D. Ohio · N.D. Cal. · S.D. Tex. · E.D. Pa.
Technology
electrography & electrophotography
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2019-1950 Canon, Inc. v. International Trade Commission Fed. Cir. 31 May 2019 325 d Closed
1:18-cv-00552 Canon, Inc. v. Do It Wiser, LLC D. Del. 13 Apr 2018 62 d Other
337-TA-1106 Canon U.S.A., Inc. v. Apex Excel Limited United States International Trade Commission 29 Mar 2018 414 d Closed
0:18-cv-60424 Canon, Inc. v. Bluedog Distribution, Inc. S.D. Fla. 28 Feb 2018 50 d Other
1:18-cv-00890 Canon, Inc. v. Do It Wiser, LLC N.D. Ga. 28 Feb 2018 49 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-01275 Canon, Inc. v. FTrade, Inc. E.D.N.Y. 28 Feb 2018 385 d Other
1:18-cv-01276 Canon, Inc. v. GPC Trading Co., Limited E.D.N.Y. 28 Feb 2018 128 d Other
1:18-cv-01278 Canon, Inc. v. 9010-8077 Quebec, Inc. E.D.N.Y. 28 Feb 2018 141 d Other
1:18-cv-02832 Canon, Inc. v. World Class Ink Supply, Inc. D.N.J. 28 Feb 2018 93 d Other
2:18-cv-00659 Canon Incorporated v. Print After Print Incorporated D. Ariz. 28 Feb 2018 35 d Other
2:18-cv-01640 Canon, Inc. v. Ninestar Technology Co., Ltd. C.D. Cal. 28 Feb 2018 54 d Stayed
2:18-cv-01671 Canon, Inc. v. Ourway US, Inc. C.D. Cal. 28 Feb 2018 54 d Stayed
2:18-cv-01679 Canon, Inc. v. Frontier Imaging, Inc. C.D. Cal. 28 Feb 2018 54 d Stayed
2:18-cv-01691 Canon, Inc. v. LD Products, Inc. C.D. Cal. 28 Feb 2018 54 d Stayed
2:18-cv-01696 Canon, Inc. v. Linkyo, Corp. C.D. Cal. 28 Feb 2018 54 d Stayed
2:18-cv-01719 Canon, Inc. v. Billiontree Technology USA, Inc. C.D. Cal. 28 Feb 2018 54 d Stayed
3:18-cv-00058 Canon, Inc. v. Ink Technologies Printer Supplies, LLC S.D. Ohio 28 Feb 2018 34 d Stayed
3:18-cv-01307 Canon, Inc. v. Master Print Supplies, Inc. N.D. Cal. 28 Feb 2018 62 d Stayed
4:18-cv-00636 Canon, Inc. v. Zinyaw, LLC S.D. Tex. 28 Feb 2018 36 d Stayed
5:18-cv-00416 Canon, Inc. v. ACM Technologies, Inc. C.D. Cal. 28 Feb 2018 54 d Stayed
5:18-cv-00882 Canon, Inc. v. The Supplies Guys, LLC E.D. Pa. 28 Feb 2018 41 d Stayed
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US9841728B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

How strong is US9841728B2?

Closest prior art, compared claim by claim, with every reference rated for how hard it hits.

Run a novelty search
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.