US9948922B2 Patent litigation record

Patent 15 cases

US9948922B2 has been asserted in 15 cases on record. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

15 cases on record

Cases on record
15
Asserted by
Vdpp · Gates · Visual Effect Innovations
Asserted against
Phoenix Sky Harbor Transportation Services · Best Western International · Frontier Airlines · Southwest Airlines · Inter IKEA Systems, B.V. · The TJX Companies · Xiaomi USA · Nec · Boxlight · Ricoh · ZTE · One Plus · Hisense USA · Optibelt · Samsung Electronics America
Courts
D. Ariz. · S.D. Tex. · E.D. Tex. · W.D. Tex. · N.D. Cal. · N.D. Tex. · C.D. Cal. · N.D. Ill.
Technology
pictorial communication (video/tv) and spectacles & lenses · optical elements & systems and spectacles & lenses · spectacles & lenses
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:26-cv-01003 Vdpp, LLC v. Phoenix Sky Harbor Transportation Services LLC D. Ariz. 12 Feb 2026 54 d Voluntary dismissal
2:26-cv-00640 Vdpp, LLC v. Best Western International Incorporated D. Ariz. 29 Jan 2026 62 d Voluntary dismissal
4:26-cv-00514 Vdpp, LLC v. Frontier Airlines, Inc. S.D. Tex. 22 Jan 2026 69 d Case Dismissed
2:25-cv-01215 Vdpp, LLC v. Southwest Airlines, Co. E.D. Tex. 12 Dec 2025 102 d Dismissed with Prejudice
4:25-cv-05900 Vdpp, LLC v. Inter IKEA Systems, B.V. S.D. Tex. 9 Dec 2025 195 d Case Dismissed
7:25-cv-00422 Vdpp, LLC v. The TJX Companies, Inc. W.D. Tex. 12 Sep 2025 245 d Dismissed with Prejudice
5:24-cv-01783 Vdpp, LLC v. Xiaomi USA, LLC N.D. Cal. 22 Mar 2024 166 d Dismissed without Prejudice
3:24-cv-00566 Vdpp, LLC v. Nec N.D. Tex. 7 Mar 2024 82 d Voluntary dismissal
7:24-cv-00069 Vdpp, LLC v. Boxlight Corporation W.D. Tex. 4 Mar 2024 358 d Voluntary dismissal
4:23-cv-03210 Vdpp, LLC v. Ricoh Company, Ltd. S.D. Tex. 30 Aug 2023 299 d Case Dismissed
2:23-cv-00373 Vdpp, LLC v. ZTE, Corp. E.D. Tex. 18 Aug 2023 123 d Voluntary dismissal
3:23-cv-01864 Vdpp, LLC v. One Plus, Corp. N.D. Tex. 18 Aug 2023 133 d Case Settled
2:20-cv-03324 Vdpp, LLC v. Hisense USA Corp. C.D. Cal. 9 Apr 2020 105 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-03179 Gates Corporation v. Optibelt Corporation N.D. Ill. 4 May 2018 642 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-00184 Visual Effect Innovations, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. E.D. Tex. 4 May 2018 244 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases asserting US9948922B2 in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

How strong is US9948922B2?

Closest prior art, compared claim by claim, with every reference rated for how hard it hits.

Run a novelty search
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.