Business, Commerce & Admin Data Processing and Electric Digital Data Processing Patent litigation record

Technology 30 cases

30 cases on record in Business, Commerce & Admin Data Processing and Electric Digital Data Processing. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

30 cases on record

Cases on record
30
Classification
G06Q50/00 · G06F15/16 · G06F3/0484 · G06Q10/10 · H04L29/06 · G06F3/0481 · G06Q40/00 · C10G65/04 · G06F17/30 · G06Q10/06 · G06F17/00 · G06Q30/00 · G06F7/00 · G06F15/173 · H04W4/24 · G06Q20/40 · G06Q20/10 · G06Q20/32 · G06Q20/38 · G06Q20/42 · G06Q40/08 · G07F19/00 · G06F7/08 · G06K5/00 · G06Q10/08 · G06Q30/02 · G06Q30/06 · G06Q10/00 · H04H1/00 · H04H60/46 · H04N7/173 · H04N21/258 · H04N21/422 · H04N21/43 · H04N21/442 · H04N21/658 · H04N21/845 · H04N21/8543 · G06F1/00 · G06F21/00 · G06Q20/04 · H04M15/00 · G06Q40/02 · G06F16/00 · H04M1/725 · G06F16/9535 · H04M1/2745 · G06F16/9537 · G01S19/34 · H04M1/72457 · H04M1/72451 · G06F3/033 · G06F3/14 · G09G5/08 · G06F3/00 · G06F3/048 · G06F9/00 · H04L29/08 · G06F9/54 · G06F9/44 · G06F12/00 · G06F13/00 · G06F15/00 · G06F15/163 · G06F40/00 · G06Q10/02 · G06Q40/04 · G07B15/00 · G07F17/00 · G07F17/42 · G06Q30/08 · G06F21/60 · G07F7/00 · G06Q20/18 · G07F7/08 · G06F9/445
Courts involved
W.D. Tex. · D. Nev. · D. Del. · E.D. Tex. · N.D. Ill. · Fed. Cir. · N.D. Tex. · S.D. Fla.
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
7:25-cv-00577 Friendship IP Protection LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc. W.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2025 147 d Case Transferred
2:25-cv-01621 Applications in Internet Time LLC v. Salesforce, Inc. D. Nev. 29 Aug 2025 7 d Case Transferred
1:25-cv-01041 Sap Se v. Trayport Limited D. Del. 19 Aug 2025 237 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:25-cv-00693 Headwater Research, LLC v. AT&T, Inc. E.D. Tex. 7 Jul 2025 84 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00695 Headwater Research, LLC v. Cellco Partnership, (dba Verizon Wireless) E.D. Tex. 7 Jul 2025 84 d Voluntary dismissal
1:25-cv-00562 Sap Se v. Trayport Limited N.D. Ill. 16 Jan 2025 208 d Case Transferred
2:24-cv-00612 Amadora Systems LLC v. Austin Bancorp, Inc. E.D. Tex. 31 Jul 2024 303 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00614 Amadora Systems LLC v. Bank of Texas, a Division of BOKF, N.A. E.D. Tex. 31 Jul 2024 303 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00616 Amadora Systems LLC v. Frost Bank E.D. Tex. 31 Jul 2024 132 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00618 Amadora Systems LLC v. Regions Financial Corporation E.D. Tex. 31 Jul 2024 132 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:24-cv-00165 Advanced Transactions, LLC v. Crunch, LLC W.D. Tex. 29 Mar 2024 564 d Voluntary dismissal
6:24-cv-00103 Advanced Transactions, LLC v. Dsw W.D. Tex. 26 Feb 2024 521 d Dismissed with Prejudice
24-1020 Personal Audio, LLC v. Google, LLC Fed. Cir. 5 Oct 2023 608 d Appeal Dismissed
4:23-cv-00576 American Airlines, Inc. v. Advanced Transactions, LLC N.D. Tex. 8 Jun 2023 92 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:23-cv-00421 CDN Innovations, LLC v. Cogeco Communications (USA), Inc. D. Del. 18 Apr 2023 240 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:23-cv-00270 Advanced Transactions, LLC v. Autozone, Inc. W.D. Tex. 12 Apr 2023 43 d Voluntary dismissal
6:23-cv-00163 Advanced Transactions, LLC v. The Gap, Inc. W.D. Tex. 3 Mar 2023 77 d Voluntary dismissal
23-1036 Caselas, LLC v. VeriFone Systems, Inc. Fed. Cir. 14 Oct 2022 592 d Appeal Dismissed
22-2272 Mira Advanced Technology Systems, Inc. v. Google, LLC Fed. Cir. 29 Sep 2022 433 d Appeal Dismissed
2:22-cv-00355 Lexos Media IP, LLC v. Northern Tool & Equipment, Co. E.D. Tex. 12 Sep 2022 421 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:22-cv-01193 Mediacom Communications, Corp. v. CDN Innovations, LLC D. Del. 9 Sep 2022 116 d Voluntary dismissal
2:22-cv-00311 Lexos Media IP, LLC v. Nike E.D. Tex. 11 Aug 2022 658 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:22-cv-00304 Lexos Media IP, LLC v. Ace Hardware, Corp. E.D. Tex. 5 Aug 2022 263 d Consent Judgment
6:22-cv-00775 Advanced Transactions, LLC v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. W.D. Tex. 12 Jul 2022 267 d Consent Judgment
2:22-cv-00175 Lexos Media IP, LLC v. Target, Corp. E.D. Tex. 25 May 2022 601 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:22-cv-00590 International Business Machines, Corp. v. Zynga D. Del. 2 May 2022 974 d Case Dismissed
2:22-cv-00090 Caselas, LLC v. Heartland Payment Systems, LLC E.D. Tex. 22 Mar 2022 1458 d Dismissed with Prejudice
9:22-cv-80276 Epic Systems, Corp. v. GreatGigz Solutions, LLC S.D. Fla. 18 Feb 2022 1181 d Judgment on the merits for Plaintiff
6:21-cv-00399 Global eTicket Exchange, Ltd. v. Ticketmaster, Inc. W.D. Tex. 23 Apr 2021 742 d Judgment on the merits for Defendant
1:20-cv-20970 PayRange, Inc. v. Kiosoft Technologies, LLC S.D. Fla. 3 Mar 2020 1245 d Case Stayed
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Business, Commerce & Admin Data Processing and Electric Digital Data Processing. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.